justasimpleinternetfarmer
64501
1600
52
Nov 22, 2024 3:42 AM
justasimpleinternetfarmer
64501
1600
52
sabrinadiesatdawn
#12 Now quadruple the distance
rabbihimself
#34 she’s hot.
justasimpleinternetfarmer
psycmoe
#28 and they didn't catch a single snail
varyael
#47 ugh, got me
PineappleIsDeliciousOnPizzaFightMe
#33
nintyuk
Are these Quails?
sharkhugs
#14 So we’re getting capitalist-splained what having multiple jobs is?
sockshoesockshoe
Just like when they tried to rename "doing exactly what your job description requires of you" to "quiet quitting"
AlmostClever
#12 isn't this an old Top Gear episode? I know they raced a Veyron down and back against a fighter jet.
dwilson0725
Working two jobs is for poor people. Polyworking is for high paying white collar jobs where they do half the work of two jobs while pretending to do two full jobs.
gumblemuntz
#28 My name is Sluggo and I'm an alcoholic...
Me too...
Hey! Me too!
Fruc
#43 ends too soon. Mom will inevitably find the ONE THING you didn’t do and scold you for it.
NerdNerdburger
Or she'll yell at you for the wheel scuff tracks all over the house.
HandoB4Javert
#6 Worst bricklayer in China competition.
amoth
the lego train person must be a millionaire. is a millionaire. the lego blocks in this video alone are worth millions
rohers
I was trying to figure out if the house or the Lego was worth more. Think it's the Lego.
InboxMeYourHDGIFs
#2 The Instant Legolas! https://youtu.be/sy_bJQaD3Uc
levelor
#5 Welp. He did get out.
Midgarmerc
#13 was that a torpedo or did we just watch people die?
abc987
I would guess seadrone
DerpMeister
It's a Houthi remote controlled sea drone used to attack international shipping in the Red Sea. That particular video was published a few month ago, showing private contractors being some LSOB by not just hitting the sea drone that's attacking them, but actually being lucky enough to detonate it with small arms fire.
torbengb
Pirates have started using remote-controlled explosive-laden boats a while back. That's what this is. Fuck'em.
WindowStreetJournal
And why does the blurring disappear around the end from that tbing?
Enderst123
It is probably motion tracking blur messed up by the explosion and camera shake that they didn't bother to fix.
WindowStreetJournal
I thought there's something written on that white, rocket-looking thing.
ogdm
#3 Anyone who has used Steam long enough knows this well. Jesus, I cannot count how many times this has happened to me.
HughJegant
#50 that mechanical baby can fuck right off!
DryAgedPopsicle
#7 Totally not sure who actually won...
ExTechOp
I think the Weta did, since at the end it was snacking off the Praying Mantis's chest.
DryAgedPopsicle
Wasn't sure about that, too, but thanks!
Zynthasius
Nexus297
#6 That's way more impressive than breaking boards along their grain.
justasimpleinternetfarmer
Darn right!
ThingsThatDontJustifyGenocide
They break right along the line that's already marked on them. IMPRESSIVE
ghotioguts
Except there's already a crack line...
SalmonTheWise
BeReasonableOrAtLeastBeFunny
#8 Fuck this fucked-up captioning style. Really, just FUCK OFF.
Abfallkonto
I kind of like them so I guess they can fuck off as long as they continue using them.
ismis2
I have ADHD and find these easier to read. I don't have an issue with "normal" captions though and don't really have a preference, but wanted to at least point out that this style might be useful for some people.
That said, literally the only opinions about captions I ever see online are people complaining about this specific style, so maybe it's more harm than good 🤷♂️
Frostycopper
Which bug lost?
PhailRaptor
Given the grasshopper was snacking on the mantis, and mantids are neither poisonous nor venomous, I'm going to go with the grasshopper
Hashbrown123
Weta, not grasshopper.
bippityboppitybuttsex
#5 https://www.nbc4i.com/news/watch-police-car-flips-over-launching-prisoner-out-back-window/
TL;DR, officer injured when cruiser flipped over, kid thrown out back window fled on foot, but was recaptured.
justasimpleinternetfarmer
I love that he was like hooray then got caught
CardeasIV
No thats common misinformation, he just gave up on kicking the windows and just did that and flew outside
Midgarmerc
He gave up but was clearly going to try to start a fire
iamlamp2
I thought he burned the cops bum
BrotherOwl
A true G with the sauce
writerbuddy
I think he earned his freedom and they should have just let him go.
MadamPuddifoot
I don't wanna fuck up my algorithm, did the cop just lose control cuz he was trying to get to the jail quickly cuz he knew methhead mcdougal was trying to break out? Or did something else happen?
bippityboppitybuttsex
Unclear.
Yepitsme2718
That's my hometown lol
cdownhour1
#32 I'm happy to live in the same universe where this happened and was caught on camera.
HughJegant
#28 these are not snails
Somnophobe
They’re just a little sluggish; that’s all.
spejic
It's 2024. Not even snails can afford houses these days.
ilovebigmutts
#3 mind your business, nobody asked you...
justasimpleinternetfarmer
R100GSPD
#2 What's that gizmo?
RacecarIsRacecarBackwards
It's just littering with extra steps.
ThrowAwayAcct0000
I want it!
theobituator
.
Slappydupappy
.
randomwalrus
A bow.
azgrak
Check out Jorge Sprave on YouTube. He will show you all it’s features. But seriously he’s German and they have very strict private gun ownership laws. His passion is projectile weapons that aren’t firearms, especially repeating weapons.
JayEnfield
Let me show you its features, HA HA HAHHHH
KoRplussomeletters
I see you have met my flock, haha! My advice, aim for the head!
whitebbwolf
GlowstickJedi
An advert
howshegettinon
I was expecting the click-cart link too. It's a common tactic to have a product in the second image and then it gets a description after a few hours with a click cart link but so far maybe it's a coincidence.
stryhf
https://youtu.be/adEDP_brU6Q
Notice it's shooting steel balls, not bolts.
Raileks
do they do less damage?
whitebbwolf
different kind of damage. if ur goal is to hurt, injure, kill other humans or kill vermin, might be a good fit. 4 hunting game? not so much
NergalJester
To something like a deer, sure, but I doubt it matters to the birds and squirrels you'd hunt with that.
SecondSince
Is he going to get those steel balls out of the water again? Of course not!
SpikeWolfwood
Well, at least they aren't plastic, I guess.
pupquine
Half-Life bow
FartsSmellBad
#14 every employer considering their employee having a second job a fireable offense
ThrowAwayAcct0000
Never read Forbes. Its Wall Street fanfiction.
[deleted]
[deleted]
ThrowAwayAcct0000
They want people to work for free. They will dress up the language, but they will do anything to get people to work for as little money as possible. Its not free labor or exploitation, it's "an unpaid internship." Or a "trial run." Or a "good learning experience/opportunity." Or a way to get "exposure." Its all nonsense.
justasimpleinternetfarmer
You should only have one job!
CptJohnYossarian
*you should only HAVE to have one job.
3wattbulb
You guys have jobs?
sonnuvah
#25 Forty years ago. Barry Marshall drank a solution of H. pylori and demonstrated its effects to cause stomach ulcers as part of his research. For this he won the Nobel Prize.
This doctor cures her own breast cancer and suddenly there's a need for debate for self-experimentation?
I get the risks but what's up with that?
mike13815
I mean there was some serious debate back then, too. Just check cross citations to MJA - hundreds of ethics studies, many from this century!
Imapseudonym
We currently live in a world where the internet exists. She used a highly experimental procedure designed for advanced breast cancer patients on herself without having the approval of the ethics committee. She is a single success story and any desperate person on the internet might not try more established methods of treatment because she was successful, which is dangerous. Remember a few years ago idiots drank sheep dewormer to cure covid without doctor supervision?
Togame21
I remember a lot of people proclaiming that they didn't care about those people, and saying much worse things than just 'I don't care', borderline criminal things. And now that one person does an experiment that will get us data to help many people, we suddenly care about her 'consent', even though she is likely the most qualified person on the planet to give informed consent to this particular treatment. Whatever, I think bodily autonomy goes both ways.
Imapseudonym
I agree, but that doesn't mean the questions shouldn't be asked.
catsnroombas
Yes this highly experimental procedure designed for advanced breast cancer is exactly as likely to be experimented with by a leyperson as sheep dewormer. There is definitely no other possible or likely reason SHE is being treated differently than HER scientific predecessor. Can't think of one. Nope.
Imapseudonym
I'm telling you this isn't a gender issue. She didn't bother getting approval from the ethics board which is REQUIRED for human or animal experimentation. I gave one example, but it's also 40 years later than his experiment, and his experiment was to prove bacteria could survive in the stomach. Hers was to prove injecting measles and the flu into her cancer would cure it. Desperate people aren't going to care that she tried normal treatments first including having a mastectomy.
Imapseudonym
Also. she's not being treated differently. Barry Marshall's experiment also raised ethical questions, and for the same reasons. He didn't get approval from the ethics board for his self experimentation. She's being treated exactly the same as he was. Or do you think the fact that she's a woman means she shouldn't be questioned the same way men would be?
CPK3
#9 Do we have a context?
Armouredfalcon
minor right wing party in govt is trying to bring in a new bill that fucks with the treaty of waitangi - our founding document - in a way that will have lasting negative effects on the Maori people. Massive protests including this haka have been going on, there was like 40k people in Wellington outside the beehive (our govt building) this week protesting.
Raileks
JodyBird
That's the longest clip of that I've ever seen, outside of watching the actual movie. Nice!
justasimpleinternetfarmer
It was a law that was trying to be passed that basically changed history for the native tribe
Heavenissize17socks
Haka says they are not impressed.
JodyBird
"We agreed to wear suits. We did not agree to be civilized."
UNHchabo
Asshole legislators in New Zealand claim that the treaty the British signed with the indigenous Maori people gives the Crown the right to rule, as opposed to establishing a power-sharing agreement.
This Maori member of Parliament performed a haka as a sign of protest against the bill, while tearing it up as shown in the video. Many other MPs and people in the gallery joined her in doing so.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/14/nz-parliament-maori-rights-bill-mps-debate-haka-new-zealand
Purplecoconut
I have watched this on repeat - makes me smile and cry. So much respect for this fierce warrior woman! So powerful.
CPK3
Thanks. I get it now.
NocturnalPigeon
Said asshole legislators also bitched to the Speaker about the haka (which included members of her party and other parties) as well as others who stood in solidarity and demanded that they be sanctioned.
eleonorae
Good for them! The haka is scary and it's meant to be. I'd be full of rage too
UNHchabo
I will also say thanks to LoadingReadyRun for teaching me what the haka is with this Magic the Gathering sketch from 2012. :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWq6TUeAPjM
eepsheep
I pulled this up thinking I was going to see a magic match interrupted by Haka.
UNHchabo
I haven't kept up with their content in a while, maybe they called back to this by having someone do the Haka before a game.
I'm pretty sure Kathleen was born in NZ even if she's spent most of her life in Canada.
Kuvajainen
As someone from the frozen north on the opposite side of the planet: HELL YEAH!!
Cheerfulinsanity
The legislation is a ridiculous piece of political showboating being pushed by the right which will never pass. However, as much as I hate to agree with Winston Peters on anything, I don't think that an mp derailing a parliamentary session with a haka is appropriate. I support her right to protest, but not in that manner, time, and place. Downvote away, I said what I said. Anyway, here's a link to Winston's speech for anyone who's interested. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yarm0Jhe7Xc
amb1021
Yeah, oppressed people should never protest in a way that's inconvenient to the oppressors. That would be unseemly.
Cheerfulinsanity
People employed as politicians should debate with words and reason while performing their role. I have no problem with protest, and agree with her position. I take issue with her choice of protest manner and location, especially when the bill is clearly never going to pass. It was a piece of performative theater, and despite this kind of performance regularly making it into parliament, I don't believe it belongs there.
amb1021
I'm sure she cares deeply about your unsolicited opinion, but stay a "disappointing white moderate."
Cheerfulinsanity
I appreciate that you took the time to offer your own unsolicited opinion in response. I was talking about a point of policy; protest of that nature should not take place while she is performing the role she is paid to perform, a role in which certain norms of behahavior are expected. Whether she cares about my opinion doesn't matter, but open discussion about the acceptable time and place for that form of protest, and whether it was appropriate given the context, is important. I'm from NZ :)