How lenses work

May 30, 2020 3:24 PM

Undy

Views

116183

Likes

3026

Dislikes

33

So here's a normal eye

And here's an image this eye sees.

Now here's an eye that has half of the pupul obstructed.

Would that eye see the image like this?

No. The image would instead appear like this - nothing is obstructed, the image is just darker because less light enters the eye.

Now the reason why that happens is to do with how lenses work - basically every part of a lens is capable of forming the whole image. The size of the lens matters only to enable more or less total amount of light to be transported (brighter or darker image).

Here you can see that even with half of the lens obstructed, the whole image is still formed, just with half as many light rays.

However the shape of the opening has an effect on the image - but only on the unfocused parts of it. Here's a modified photography lens with a heart cutout in front.

The image taken with such a lens - as you can see the parts of the image that are in focus are unaffected, but the bright lights in the background have taken the shape of hearts. That's how bokeh works.

Here's a hexagonal aperture of a photography lens.

The bokeh in a photo taken by such a lens would also take a hexagonal shape like in this image.

But there's also another place where you can see that effect - lens flares. Here every secondary flare is also a hexagon. But there's another effect going on - there are 6 distinct spikes around the sun - those are formed by diffraction of light along the straight edges of the hexagonal aperture. If the aperture was an octagon, there would be 8 spikes etc.

You can also see that effect in the Hubble Space Telescope images - here every bright star has a four way cross around it.

This is because Hubble, like most Newtonian telescopes has a secondary mirror in front of the primary mirror - it's suspended in the middle of the telescope by four thin beams that are forming the cross pattern. The light entering the telescope diffracts along the edges of the beams and forms those cross flares around bright stars.

For the human eye, it's worse, because the brain also makes shit up. It's why it's difficult to know when there's minor damage.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's pretty fucking neat

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a physics MSc, by the fourth image, I was ready to get quite angry. Upvote for the excellent explanation.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks! The explanation, especially the lens diagram is very simplified but I hope it gets the point across :P

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for sharing your expertise and knowledge :)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This post has both depth and perception. No lack of vision found.

5 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 0

It also has an OPTICAL illusion. But seriously, go to the picture with the black heart and scroll up and down and see what happens

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Poked myself in the eye trying this out. Worth it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want to live where this eye sees.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 1

As an optical engineer, I approve of this message.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People who suffer from hemianopia have vision like #4 usually cause by damage to the optic nerve. From stroke, tumor or other trauma

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Let me summarize this for everyone. Science. Science is how lenses work.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but it's exactly "explanations" like these that cause so many people nowadays to be scientifically illiterate.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody show the aperture shape effects to Michael Bay or JJ Abrams. We'll fucking cut you.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes, but I want you to imagine Michael Bay using heart bokeh in his explosions.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What an eye-opener

5 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 1

Bokeh fun. Hearts, ufos, rings. Can also be created in so many ways, also with telescopes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks for bringing this into focus

5 years ago | Likes 809 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post makes me see things differently

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*autofocus.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Homemade bokeh lense mods are so fun to mess around with

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Eye liked this post.

5 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

pupul

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I always wondered why pictures had these effects. Thanks!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I just wish that game devs would stop implementing imperfections like chromatic aberration and lens flares into their games.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think one of the problems is game developers don't go outside during the day.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I also do 3D graphics, and I can tell you that using reference is almost mandatory. It's usually the art directors that fuk these things up.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. Many art directors have some movie background and they really believe that games want those effects.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes! The only time lens flares (and dirt) make sense is when the character is wearing a helmet, googles etc.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Life imitates art and it’s artifacts

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you have larger than average eyes, does that mean everything appears brighter to you?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also could that be a cause for photic sneeze reflex?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pk, cool, but... am I the only one who saw the heart on the lense bounce like a motherfucker when scrolling?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's probably because your monitor is an IPS panel - they can have artifacts like these.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, you guys are relentless with these puns :P

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

As is tradition.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's reflective of the nature of the average imagur user

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And to some extent of how interesting we found the material.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, not an imgur regular but I certainly noticed a pattern with the comments under my posts :P

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your theory is not solid, simple explanation is cover the half of your camera lens and see what happens.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That really depends on the lens - photographic lenses are complicated, they have multiple glass elements making them behave differently...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

than a single glass lens. For some lenses covering half would only cut the light by 50%, and for some it would obstruct the image.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My zoom lens for example is the latter. Some fast prime lenses on the other hand are the former. My telescope also behaves like the former.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isnt the image inverted until the brain translates it into the correct orentation

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Very interesting. Are you able to help me understand why during an eclipse, a circular hole produces a light shape similar to the eclipse?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Small holes work similarly to how lenses work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camera_obscura

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact that's how eyes evolved - they had pinholes instead of lenses, in fact some worms still have these 'unevolved' eyes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As you can see pinholes can also form an image - they have a downside - they let through way less light.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0