Correct - there's no official language in England but it is the *legal* language to be used in courts, having taken over from Latin previously, although it took from 1362 until 1730 (!) to formalise that.
Its gonna be so they don't have to provide interpreters for people who don't speak English(at court hearing, government functions, ect). Wonder if they'll fire all the sign language interpretors too? Another "cruelty is the point" kind of thing
Even Congress tried that. Didnt fly well. And he cannot "create" law with executive orders. So this is another media hoarding tactic and yall keep falling for it.
What exactly does falling for it entail? Is it somehow less xenophobic because it can't be made a law? Is it less likely to embiggen racists because congress didn't pass it as legislation?
Same way yall focused on his panama, then greenland, then gaza, bullshit. To hoard news and online exposure. Hoarding exposure and yall dont know what democrats do. Thinking it is lost. Propaganda of the new millennial. Use scandal to hoard social media and news.
Did you get ChatGPT to write this for you? It reads like someone that's only familiar with english through a translation app. No one uses the word hoard that way. Also "Hoarding exposure and yall dont know what democrats do." feels like it was written specifically to not make sense. And I think you meant millennium there are no new millennials.
Im sorry you dont write English well. Might be that "foreign troll school" you were studying at. Now do us all a favor and go tell babushka to malajipaya.
CabooseDM
You're welcome america
skapanda616
q2grapple
This is sure to make us “great” and lower prices!
PlatypusPowersActivate
LitterBoxKing
I hope U.S. schools teach that there's only one branch in its government now.
JosefKJerome
It's not even the official language of England.
faro2000
Correct - there's no official language in England but it is the *legal* language to be used in courts, having taken over from Latin previously, although it took from 1362 until 1730 (!) to formalise that.
shawnemack
Hijo de puta
arthurvanhoudt
Just asking, after 249 years without, why do this? Must be a decoy!
lackinglife
I'm assuming this is basically the equivalent of a state bird/flower, Though I'm guessing it's gonna be played up like a new law
Corrodias
It's not even that, it's just "Trump says". The executive branch lacks the authority to set any such thing.
Totallyscrewedinaustin
Its gonna be so they don't have to provide interpreters for people who don't speak English(at court hearing, government functions, ect). Wonder if they'll fire all the sign language interpretors too? Another "cruelty is the point" kind of thing
RobbieRodriguez
Even Congress tried that. Didnt fly well. And he cannot "create" law with executive orders. So this is another media hoarding tactic and yall keep falling for it.
KR1570F
What exactly does falling for it entail? Is it somehow less xenophobic because it can't be made a law? Is it less likely to embiggen racists because congress didn't pass it as legislation?
RobbieRodriguez
Same way yall focused on his panama, then greenland, then gaza, bullshit. To hoard news and online exposure. Hoarding exposure and yall dont know what democrats do. Thinking it is lost. Propaganda of the new millennial. Use scandal to hoard social media and news.
KR1570F
Did you get ChatGPT to write this for you? It reads like someone that's only familiar with english through a translation app. No one uses the word hoard that way. Also "Hoarding exposure and yall dont know what democrats do." feels like it was written specifically to not make sense. And I think you meant millennium there are no new millennials.
RobbieRodriguez
Im sorry you dont write English well. Might be that "foreign troll school" you were studying at. Now do us all a favor and go tell babushka to malajipaya.
originalhuman
Stay stupid, my shit. You cannot do any better than be my shit.