Coronavirus may dice heart muscle fibers into tiny snippets, remove cells DNA.

Sep 13, 2020 8:02 PM

DrVenture420

Views

103937

Likes

1792

Dislikes

49

https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-may-dice-heart-muscle-fibers-cells.html

Edit: thanks guys! Stay safe!

coronavirus

health

facemask

mildly_interesting

This is why re-opening the economy and schools is incredibly stupid and I would not expose anyone I care about until we all get the vaccine.

5 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

Cool I can call Co-Vid 'my ex' now

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is fine.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Livescience.com sure seems like a credible source

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Prevention is better than cure. Wear a mask people.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cut my heart into pieces. Remove my DNA.

5 years ago | Likes 466 Dislikes 4

God dammit

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

“May do that...”may”...”

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

cut my heart in 2 pizzas this is my last resort

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

WATEVER HAPPENSH, HAPPENSH!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Clots in blood vessels, respiratory damage, chances of strokes increased from clots, and now heart damage. This sounds more like a bioweapon

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*commences mental gymnastics to rationalize conspiracy*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

New blood test...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Worrying, but still a preprint about tests in dishes. This is a long way from published, view in that context... Concerned action not panic

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All the skepticism is puzzling. “Let’s not go crazy avoiding COVID - it might NOT kill your DNA!” Dude. Why not err on the side of caution?

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

“Oh shit, if turns out it DOES cause permanent damage taking decades off your life. But at least I got to go to the game!”

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'm with you. Not gonna go full Howard Hughes, but "We don't know what it will do" is bad enough. I don't want to be a case study.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So, Im essential... I'm terrified.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imgur should have a policy to not post non-peer reviewed studies. Nothing to do with this article but in general its dumb

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"the new finding ... has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, or proven to happen in people. "

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But there are autopsies showing very evocative evidence that it or something like it does happen in people.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm too dumb to get it. I just wear the face thing and have purell.

5 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 1

Then you’re not too dumb, you’re one of the smart ones.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Dumb but good, listens to the smart ones.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And stay home as much as possible. Masks and distance are nowhere near as effective as simply not being where virus carriers are.

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

Oh I lost like all my muscle mass doing that. Kinda pissed about losing so much hard work but.. it's the journey I guess.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Good time to experiment with high-resistance body weight exercises!

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

TIL: Coronavirus is just my ex in disguise.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remember, one study can be meaningless until proven repeatable and peer reviewed

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supercomputer-found-promising-theory-why-115500793.html nothing to see here, just a hoax, just sniffles

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Going to be interesting to see the potential long term effects in years to come, in a sad way. If we don't get taken out by something else

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And guess who got diagnosed with hypertension in this year of chaos? Yup, this guy. FUCK

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"bUt iTs jUsT tHe fLu! oNlY A sMaLl pErCenTaGe dIe! I nEeD a hAiR cUt!"

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ok. As long as it doesn't affect my dick.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It seems that blood clotting is a common side effect, so give it time. We're still only 9 months into the lifespan of this disease.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Your dick definitely needs your heart to do a few things.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What the fuck corona?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Stay home.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It says there's no proof it happens inside people, wouldn't that be easy to prove? Find person dead from covid, look at heart?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Did you not read past the pretty picture?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, what am I missing?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The autopsy sample analysis that had similar structural changes?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So I gotta ask, Why can they not prove it happens in the human body if they see that it happened in a corpse?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Experimenting on humans is illegal.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would explain the sudden rise of heart diseases in covid-survivers

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's no effective control group (what does common cold e.g. rhinovirus do?) and is in a dish not a human. I'm NOT denying it MAY cause...

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 10

What? You think no one has studied the common cold before?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because so many people catch a cold or flu and up with heart disease and lung transplants. I can totally understand your skepticism.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 12

Skepticism of a preprint archive paper that has not passed peer review should be the norm. That doesn’t mean it’s wrong, but be cautious.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Being skeptical by saying we don't have a control to compare the common cold is irrelevant at best and actively stupid at worst

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t like that comp either for *gestures wildly at everything* but I don’t t know much about viruses so reliance on peer review is good

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...heart injury, I'm just saying it's important to be accurate in our reporting and not sensationalist which is currently v easy to do.

5 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 7

Well, we know it causes heart problems, this just might be an explanation behind the mechanism.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As you pointed out, MIGHT be.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not accusing OP of sensationalism directly of course. These can come from reputable sources! But there's levels of nuance in these papers.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

My thoughts as well. Also, username is on point.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Not peer-reviewed yet" is usually a good sign to wait before spreading the study in main stream media...

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Username incredibly relevant

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0