Exposing the minimum wage

Jun 21, 2021 11:34 AM

Lanhdanan

Views

108464

Likes

3897

Dislikes

103

Exposing the minimum wage

current_events

living_wage

exposed

inequality

exploitation

A 7-11 nearby closed down and the guy in charge says it's because of the government enablers. No, it's cuz you guys hatefuck your employees.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Minimum Wage: If we could pay you less we would.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have a solution for then, rather than dropping the unemployment benefits, how about they go with the free market and increase wages

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The US is in decay, cuz we keep electing conservatives bought by foreign corporations!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's painfully obvious our leaders have forgotten what it's like to put in 40 hours for minimum wage.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

There are people in my state crowing that the labor shortage is because people are getting paid more on unemployment. The DLR reported >>

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

>> that only 1500 people in the state are still getting COVID relief unemployment. But people are still blaming "free money"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Our corporate handlers don't want us to help people."

4 years ago | Likes 933 Dislikes 13

Because we are slaves living in a prison where you cant see the bars or touch them but they are there

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

+1 for “corporate handlers”

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then we should give them more to work Tim Scott

4 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 6

4 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

Hold up - this implies that minimum wage is enough to live on. It isn’t. You need at least two or three minimum wages to live.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Heard folks say "no one wants to work cause they make more on unemployment, but my husband cant find a job that pays enough. It's not right"

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Remember true Repub family values include your 6 year old working in a coal mine

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"The poors never know how to budget."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They prefer having homeless people, because they aren't getting money.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Republicans think normal folks be like

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I worked 60h a week just to barely get by while my boss came to work in a Lamborghini. Not to work of course, getting a free meal.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Worked for a company where a good chunk of our yearly pay was a Christmas bonus. Owner proceeded to show of new Vette and no bonus.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When people question any money our company is making, I tell them the boss's jet and Porsche collections don't pay for themselves.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A black republican LOL!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We cannot encourage people making millions from corporate handouts and lobbying to represent the American people and what's best for us all

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

None of us would be doing any of their mind-blowingly depressing jobs if we had actual savings and no debt. They need us on a leash.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Republican strategy is to empower employers by preserving a ready supply of desperate people willing to slave away for practically nothing.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Giving people a livable wage threatens that ready supply.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I dont get how simple the solutions are, but we cant change it

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They have momentum. The system has supported them for decades. We're just waking up.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"We're so short-sighted that we don't realise if people don't have spare money, they can't afford our shit"

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

Yep. Again, there're always those who disagree with a sensible, fair and good life for all. They never respond. That probably speaks louder.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you don't have spare money, their shit is all you can afford

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ah, the Wal-Mart business model!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wonder what their excuse is gonna be when ending unemployment benefits doesn't solve the problem?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The problem for them, is unemployment. They need a slave force to power the empires of the 1%, and it will never be enough

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The area's sounding Phoenix have always used immigrants for certain jobs. Like McDonalds. There are plenty of other jobs to be had.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a shocking surprise that Senator Tim Scott is a Republican. /s

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 11

If you own a business and you pay people less than a living wage, then you don't own a viable business.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

FDR intensifies.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

40% of available jobs don't meet the average unemployment of $750/week. We don't have a labor shortage, we have a living wage shortage.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Wow your unemployment is £40 less than my take home as IT Sytems Engineer

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When people can make more money sitting at home, why would they want to go back to work?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that isnt even a lot of money, in a ton of areas that isnt even enough for rent and food

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did specify it was the AVERAGE unemployment. Meaning it's more in some places and less in others.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last yr with the extra $600 UE in my state was equal to $20 an hr. Not a living wage shortage when that's what I made after college & 20 yrs

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Experience.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we made everything robots and nobody had to work literally at all and I know that’s virtually impossible but if we did would that be bad?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The people putting the capital up to make the robots would reap all the benefits

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Depends. The question is how to fairly distribute products and services when only a minority has to work to keep things running? Who is (1)

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

owning the means of (automated) production? The answers will decide if the outcome will be bad or good.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tim Scott is right. People shouldn't make more money in unemployment. So let's raise our horrid low wages to something you can live off.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If your position is three letters and starts with a C your multi million dollar bonus of top of multi million salary can be cut to make due.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nobody loses since you're probably already so rich the world will end before your kids kids kids kids can use your wealth.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perhaps we should have a maximum wage.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

If you think wages are the biggest contributor to wealth disparity you're missing the point, no one ever became a billionaire on salary.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They will work around it somehow. For example, often the bulk of CEO income comes from stock grants and options. Also big "expense" funds.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wealth tax.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bezos salary is $80k/yr. They will find ways around it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

link it to a percentage of the minimum

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Recall: the $600 additional weekly unemployment payment was on top of other insurance. $600 is what one makes $15/hr 40 hrs/week. 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2/2 So the 600 additional was necessarily giving people more than their living wage, and had nothing to do with cost of living

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In Oregon, you could make $5k/month on unemployment

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

But let's continue this narrative that this is good and essential

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's not. Safety nets are back stops - not rewards. I'd rather save the resources to expand them to more people as needed.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Raise the pay. Companies need workers and if none show up they will raise the pay or close the doors

4 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 7

The labor market takes time to adjust, even in these circumstances a matter of months is very fast.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah often times change, even good change, has costs that take time. I'm not a fan of abrupt changes unless well planned.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When we are talking about such vast and complex systems idk if we'll planned abrupt change exists. Comes back to point A, change takes time.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get downvoted often for this comment, but closing the doors does not help the people working there, it hurts them a lot. When people say

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

they're fine with a place closing, it seems their goal isn't helping the workers like they same, but to lash out at the rich. Which is ok,

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

but not at the expense of the people working for them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

That's called growing pains. Yeah, it will suck, but eventually someone who will pay a living wage will fill the gap. The fact that our

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

abusers have made us dependent on them isn't a good reason to keep them around.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People aren't outright saying the place should close. They're saying if they aren't willing to pay their workers right they deserve to close

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I know, but I'm saying,the people working those jobs, wouldn't want that. Some want us to boycott places, not thinking boycotts hurt workers

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1