GitHub renaming "master" makes black developer uncomfortable

Jun 15, 2020 11:01 PM

dandv

Views

2691

Likes

84

Dislikes

5

github

blm

Github is now Microsoft....that should explain some of the changes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Always prefered the trunk & branch nomenclature myself, but I still disagree with the change.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

i just got done pushing a project from Visual Studio to my master branch into DevOps. i guess i never really thought about it

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Remember when you had to set your IDE devices as master/slave?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I always take it as the Mast of a Ship and the branches (that are kept) provide sail functionality.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I honestly don't get why, because in this case "master" means the original or production copy, similar to a master key or master disk.

5 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 4

The etymology of "master" in Git is from an older VCS system that DID use master/slave terminology. IMO its mostly a UI change so its fine

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Fair enough, but was the slave part even used in GitHub?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because of the connotation of the word. People, some people, hear master and associate it with something unintended.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They better not make me relearn the pinout jumpers for my trusty IDE drives, too!

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

...I seem to recall someone raising a stink about that at one point back when IDE drives were still the primary interface type.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when you forget about the systemic issues that actually need changeing and just kowtow too symbolic gestures.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

This just in: it's now called 'massuh' branch.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You'd think the CEO of GitHub wouldnt have his head up his own ass about his own company. That's some next level dumbassery

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What a steaming load of horse manure.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I think tackling the whole naming scheme of Master/Slave for failover systems, or drives and many other things would better

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

And that's already been done. They're referred to primary/secondary. "Master" is also used as the original copy of something, but there's /1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but it's not industry wide really. Was more talking outside source control like Git. Even Jenkins still uses slave terms,& many others

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

no other word used in conjunction with it in GitHub's case (except maybe "clone," which isn't racial or referencing slavery).

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Master/slave in that context has nothing at all to do with black people. It is absurd.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Honestly “words carry meaning” is not a concept I thought I’d have to defend today

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Google the word connotation. The idea behind communication is to convey ideas. If your phrasing is misunderstood it needs reevaluating.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

The idea of master/slave relationship is quite clear without any connotation to black people. Get a grip.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes. If you're talking to yourself while sitting in a sound proof room. Try having a conversation with the average human being sometime.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Do you often talk about the particulars of managing source code with people not familiar with the topic,

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And then they'll reshoot Ghostbusters and remove any mention of the Key Master. Also replace the positron gliders with walkie talkies.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0