He gotta learn somehow

Oct 24, 2019 7:23 PM

patchfoot

Views

156376

Likes

5905

Dislikes

48

funny

memes

programming_humor

Things like non-ADA compliant sites make me realize how few devs care about syntactically correct markup. They mess up the simplest part.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not all heros wear capes.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Back in the day I'd do that too, sometimes using a tool like Front Page or Dreamweaver. I was called a Webmaster.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, that's generally what I do for a quick design now. I'll use Parcel or something to get everything setup and get it how I like it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How else do you build a Mechwarrior 2 clan page with pixely burning torch graphics?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure what is weirder to me, that this would make it to the #1 spot or that people still use Ember

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bet he was using notepad

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

These comments

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

You all need a GUI? LMAOOOOO!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When I started at my current job they asked me which GUI I preferred...I said "The terminal."

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nerd!!! I love it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I learned HTML from MySpace... get at me I’ll fight I don’t care

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I bet it loaded fast too, and didn't spy on its users.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'd rather write html on paper, scan it into a pdf then convert that into a word doc then convert that to plain text than use ember

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Guys. This is the only way I know how to do it. What do I do instead? I’m serious.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Personally, for simple websites, I use a static site generator like Middleman or Hugo. I'd give them a look. They can save you some time 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're building a complex enough web application, then take a look at Vue.js or React. But the learning curve can be steep. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Frontpage 98 all the way

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fucking crazy how someone making a ui would decide to do so without using the same framework as everyone else. Jolly g willikers

5 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 9

sometimes sarcasm is superfluous

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

I don’t know what those words mean so I’m going to take them as an insult

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

I like your style

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You think you're tough ? I write all my code in nano with putty. ALL. ALWAYS.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

lol, nano peasant. Vim master race.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I bow to my ancestors.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. I would also, reluctantly, have accepted emacs. I thought nano was for children?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You think he was psycho writing raw HTML? He could have been using FrontPage. You have no idea how sane he was.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is how we learned in the 90s. I still do it that way sometimes.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

"That's how dad did it, that's how America does it, and it's worked out pretty well so far."

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Notepad then Textpad and FTPVoyager. HTML and PERL in the 90s. Still do it that way now. Just not PERL. Get off my lawn!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

say qq("Love PERL") or die;

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In a text editor, not even sublime or bb edit

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Pico or gtfo.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to poo-poo VS Studio but goddamn I've learned to appreciate it. But I also use Textpad and Notepad++ on the regular as well

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://xkcd.com/378/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And his page loads 14 seconds faster.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You really don't need frontend rendering. Everything can be done in the backend

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

You are evil, and you must be destroyed.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And if you use proper caching at the server its even fast as fuck (depends on what you need ofc)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a beginner, what would one need to start building a website?

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Guess it depends, are you looking to be a website developer, or just get your own website up and going?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FreeCodeCamp

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Check out this curriculum: https://www.theodinproject.com/courses 100% free and regularly maintained.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freecodecamp

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Start with html, then CSS, then JS. As tool notepad ++ then sublime text. Let your creativity speaks and find the way to realize your idea.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Visual Studio Code or Sublime Text are good IDEs for HTML and CSS.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Learn about how the web works first. What is a request, how it travels from the user's PC to the server and back again, what is http.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess it depends what kind of website you want to make....making simple pages in HTML is really easy to learn and if done properly they 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

don't exactly look like shit (especially if you use frames). For Dummies has a really good book on HTML IIRC. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In notepad type hello world save as a .html and open in a browser. Boom, 1st website

5 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

For some motivation learning js: https://play.elevatorsaga.com/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wow!

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I heard you don't even need the body tag anymore.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Well technically the DOM will generate one for you, but why wouldn’t you?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait, really? (feels old)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Meh, that's just a local webpage. I don't consider it a website until it's at least hosted somewhere you can access regardless of comp used

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

They asked where one would start and starting from the absolute basics would be square 1.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Web hosting is for AFTER you write the page. And save it. Don't forget to save it. In plain-text format, with .htm or .html ext.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There might be something nice on codeacademy, too!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

https://www.w3s/html/">https://www.w3schools.com/html/chools.">/html/">https://www.w3schools.com/html/a> https://notepad-plus-plus.org/ https://www.hostingadvice.com/how-to/free-web-hosting/ (free start at 6)

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I recommend Atom instead of notepad++

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a text editor of some kind, HTML/CSS for the content and styling, JavaScript for interactive elements.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Ok

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Those are all great places to start. Learn the basics and get good at them. Then look at a server-side language or two.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Honestly I wasn't aware there WERE other ways to make websites until i had been doing it in notepad, by hand for months. Ahh the late 90s

5 years ago | Likes 421 Dislikes 1

When your other options were things like the bloated monstrosity generator FrontPage, you learned to love notepad.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know what you're thinking.. did he use 5 's in this row or just 6? Well to tell you the truth, I lost track myself...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wrote my first website for $$ on a bar napkin at Hooters in 1996.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

in the late 90's there really wasn't any other good way to do it.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

WYSIWYG editors were so buggy back then and injected tons of redundant code; much cleaner and easier to troubleshoot doing it by notepad

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or BBEDIT/Notepad++ rather

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Certainly not Frontpage or Word, the garbage code that came outta that.. Bleh.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nested tables for everyone! This   gets a table! This   gets a table!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't make us remember dreamweaver.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You have to EARN Dreamweaver. If you jump in without knowing code, you're gonna have a bad time.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Use Notepad++ Highlights for about 30 - 40 different languages.

5 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 2

Eh, Notepad was all I needed for no-frills plain-text files. Sure, the font it uses is ugly, but It got the job done.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Haven't done any website work since College... CSS was a shock to me. I used to make sites on Angelfire

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

You mistyped Visual Studio Code.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These are all some funny exotics names for EMACS.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Emacs is best for code/run/debug cycle, vim for text editing

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

:q

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, god no. This isn't 1997 anymore.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My favorite vim command is "Esc-:! sudo apt-get install emacs".

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I use ++ for my pl/sql. Love it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Try VS Code.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will. I was given admin rights to my laptop, so I don't need to put in a ticket either.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Atom and sublime text blow it away at this point.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Both vastly inferior to VS Code

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Debatable

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Use VS Code. It's like Notepad++ on steroids, then you learn about extensions. Good middle ground between a heavy ide and sublime/notepad++

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Brackets is a great tool too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Agreed, I usually abhor MS products, but VSCode is solid. I moved from Atom about a year ago, and aside from a couple hiccups with some 1/

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

3rd party packages, my experience has been overwhelmingly positive. Featureful enough to be useful, but still let’s me do what I want to.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm 34, I have no idea how to code. I imagine that Java is to HTML as PowerPoint is to hand drawn animation. Is this an appropriate analogy?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Java is to HTML as PowerPoint is to Excel. They do completely different things.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No. Hey, you asked.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

HTML isn't code, it's just markup. Closer to editing a wikipedia entry than anything.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wait... so, HyperText Markup Language is markup, not code?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude was genuinely asking. Not everybody needs to know how computers work. I'm a systems engineer. I don't think a plumber is dumb if they

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

can't use gcc to debug a segmentation fault. I might if he can't replace a solenoid, but I don't expect anybody to just know how

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

computers work unless there's a good reason for them to know. Don't be a dick.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You’re a psychopath if you use one of those frameworks, when plain and simple html would do the trick.

5 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 2

What? You mean your "under construction" page/banner doesn't need 200mb of node_modules?! Psycho.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

"Okay, let's start by setting up our dev environment. Step 1: install gentoo"

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Step 83: start writing code

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I see you've used bootstrap

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh man...so many closing tags needed ahhh

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I do this every day? Like for years now. Ummm...is this bad?

5 years ago | Likes 529 Dislikes 7

Yes. It is.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Develop in a framework; debug and optimize in HTML. That allows you to solve both issues of productivity vs possible performance issues.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bless you and your un-bloated sites.

5 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 3

I did the same for years! Now that I am looking for a new job, I can say that it is bad. No one wants you without those languages.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Depends on your salary and living expenses

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me too. Those frameworks are a pain. Check out vanilla JS framework if you want the best performance.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Best for maintaining. Code 13,years old. Easy to edit without the whole site blowing up.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If you don't use any javascript then yeah. React was made to make everything smoother.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Depends what you're doing...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I still do this daily... for email... because a significant portion of our client base refuses to stop using old AF browsers/Email Clients.=

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

a href says what

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

http links ? *tztztz*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and missind the :

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

missing*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, it just means you don't trip over yourself to instantly jump on every new fad bandwagon.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That is an odd way of saying "you don't bother to learn new stuff"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Like what? Is that a dig at WordPress?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's someone yelling at the clouds because tech as passed them by.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lol, it means your old.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

No. Having a site that doesn't take 20 seconds to load and require a quad-core processor just to scroll is far batter.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Pahlease. I build all sites in WordPress and they load plenty quick. It's a lot easier to charge customers for speedy cloud hosting then...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

for hand-coding a website. Saving 1.5 seconds is negligible compared to what they save and the expandibility of the top open-source CMS.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not the customers I worry about - it's the visitors.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No. Well built websites for the most part always have some manual HTML/php/JavaScript coding. WordPress is a virus sex party

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No, it's just not trendy. Components in React allow for non-repetitive code (faster dev). If there's no client-server talk, then that's it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not bad, just likely means your building static sites or ones not requiring client side off-loading or a PWA app.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, that just means non js user can use your site and it won''t waste bazillion of mb ram.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

SlowClap.gif

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nope, imgur is just very stupid

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

The profession “web developer” and the college courses for it wouldn’t exist if those websites did the same thing

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

These votes are completely contradictory lol...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the votes on these two comments is a good example

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Little did you know the psychopath within

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We are all a little psychopathic

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just means it will survive long for so long, people will always call it outdated.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do the same whenever possible. Dependency hell is worse in js than any other language I've used so sticking with the basics is a good call

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

React/vue/etc and jquery don't really create dependency hell. It's all the other shit ppl like to add

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They have ALOT of frameworks that help u build stuff much faster and with nice features out of the box

5 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 2

Browser-based WYSIWYG editors can go and die in every possible fire of hell.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not every site/client needs a CMS, and not every CMS provides nice clean code by default for their layouts.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heh “faster”

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

No, you make the web tolerable.

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

The sites that you prefer aren't done in HTML / CSS / JS

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing would make the web intolerable. It is what it is and here we are

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only bad if you are still using vi. Or vim. I mean, come on. Notepad+ is the way to go! Have some standards people. (I use gedit (....

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

yes. With frameworks like wordpress you can build a working detailed site in an hour, including SEO and attaching the domain.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

CMS bloat. No thanks.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thought so too, but i just had to set one up, and if you can live with php and running prob. the most attacked platform ever its kinda nice.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blocking xmlrpc.php and only allow localhost for wp_admin/ + Wordfence plugin takes care of that tho

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WordPress, joomla areagh etc always, always, always cause more pain than their initial 5 min setup. Like. I will phong you pain

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Maybe if you don't know what you're doing in those platforms. But it also isn't 2010. Those platforms have evolved. (maybe you should too)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I knew enough about them, and still do, to prefer writing my own. The base frameworks are OK, but when 3ed party plugins start to fail.. :(

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How so? ive only used them for family,friends, some gaming communities and for a couple IT courses, never had an issue. You can just go into

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

into HTML"mode" or insert custom code at any point, if you need something specific or advanced.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah probably. Mostly in my job I have to create very bespoke systems where frameworks wouldn't work. I'm just being snooty

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It does seem a bit odd. I mean, I program in java and CPP...there isnt any other way to do it...

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

.Net here. I don't see any other way to do it either.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Dude, TypeScript.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I recently did a security code review for a company that wrote a cryptowallet entirely in javascript, 2mil loc with 43% duplication and over

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

400k errors, the report was 316mb. Sometimes theres good reason to learn a new language. But I'm with you guys, java c++ and c# have always

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Been there for me

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No friend, it means we’re old.

5 years ago | Likes 436 Dislikes 4

No friend. This makes you skilled

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

React requires dramatically more skill and talent than HTML does.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have to agree with this.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not old, I have black framed glasses! *hides BASIC book on desk*

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

POKE 650, 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah, BASIC. From the good old days, back when when Apple computers still ran on MS-DOS.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I still have my fortran 77 diskettes, but I inherited them in 2000

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, it means you actually know how to code, rather than letting a prog or app do it for you.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

If you think that HTML is coding and something like React isn't then you're a fucking idiot.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not everyone has kept up with webpage design over the last 20 years. I haven't touched HTML since 1997. So forgive the fuck out of me for ->

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

not knowing what tools exist for generating webpages 22 years later.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

React is programming... It's like a website that you compile in order to ship it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I haven't done anything with webpage design for over 20 years, so I was just going by the OP to decide that it was some kind of UI ->

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

doing web design, like AOLPress or FrontPage, where you build the page in an editor, and the prog writes out the HTML in the background.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

19 here. Code in HTML... uhhh

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

What version.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

33 here. Still code in html. I didnt know there was another way. Wtf is Vue?? Ember? React!?? What? Html editor and an ftp client. Done!

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

49 here. Still pissed about IE 6. Still think the automated color coding in code editors is Buck Rogers stuff.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Last fancy editor I recall hearing about was Dreamweaver. For me, web stuff ? Bluefish : emacs; What do you use?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oops that's not entirely true: geany for Java.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use atom for big projects, notepad for tiny quick ones

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For me, VS Code and Visual Studio

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Think "Front Page", but even worse, because as bad as it was, at least Microsoft knew coding.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

The comparison to front page isn't even remotely apt.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe, but hand-coded HTML is more likely compatible with non-MS browsers (as long as you don't use IE-only commands).

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aren't those all considered hipster javascript frameworks?

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Wait till he sees someone building a geocities site

5 years ago | Likes 729 Dislikes 5

Gopher.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I more remember angelfire ^^.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol my first website

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It still exists in Japan

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You should have seen my “Mr. T AND Hanson ‘Ate my balls’ “ pages on AngelFire. OC before OC was OC.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Omg u r ancient... like me ?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I won an award for my geocities webpage.... The directions and resources to inoculate and harvest hallucinogenic shrooms was hidden on it

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Notepad HTML and Geocities... My youth making fan websites for games and MIDI files lol

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I had a Troma movies fan site on Tripod

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sign my guestbook!! It’s under construction but here’s a gif of a dancing hamster!

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Or tripod (sp)... I built way too many gaming clan sites back in the day there.. I need to get better at bye, but svelte/sapper I like

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My yearbook caption has my old geocities url.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

What was the rival ..? Angelfire or something?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

I wish that shit was still around.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

If you remember your address, it might be on archive.org's wayback machine.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

neocities?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I miss all that. What an awesome thing Geocities was... they should bring it back! I feel like it would do great.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

https://archiv">ties.php">https://archive.org/web/geocities.php http://www.oocities.org/ copied from above

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They did. It was called MySpace.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

MySpace was totally different.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I... Haven't heard that name for so long

5 years ago | Likes 197 Dislikes 2

Webrings.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's neocities now. Full of niche folk that dig the old sites and weird web 1.0 aesthetic.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hope you’re as excited as I was to discover Neocities. https://neocities.org/

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Angelfire

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I ran a xxxgirlsxxx page on geocities. I was in jr high.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I feel as though this could have an interesting story

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just downloaded tons of porn pictures and posted them on the page. I overused and

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Via: gnutella, morpheus, and kazaa

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Netscape Navigator

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

I built my first website in pico; might have been for lynx.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Newgrounds

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

lynx

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was my browser. I'd sign into AOL, minimize their IE-based interface, and open Netscape. On Windows 3.1.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone know if there is an archive of the old geocities pages?

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Try the WayBack Machine. You can lookup almost any website as it looked on any year. Cool stuff.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://archiv">ties.php">https://archive.org/web/geocities.php http://www.oocities.org/

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We used Angelfire as a host in my freshman high school Comp Lit class. Good times.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I made so many dumb ass sites on here. So many. Thought I was the coolest guy ever. Black background with red, purple, and green text.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Angelfire? That's ringing some dusty old bells.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Angelfire is STILL ACTIVE

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I occasionally pull up my old site and cringe at what I'd made back in the late 90s, but I learned HTML to make it look decent.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep! Back in the days of static pages, sigh.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Theres only so much you can do with only html though.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Well sure. Then you manipulate that HTML with some CSS and Javascript and you can do a whole bunch more.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

A whole site in js! *shudder*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But you can still do quite a bit, and you don't have to worry about standards-compliant browsers not being able to show it properly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(gives side-eye to Internet Explorer)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You also have to remember that in those dark ages we're talking about, many of us were accessing the web via 56k-or-less dialup modems,

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and that webpages with lots of fiddly little js bits to add sparkles and imbedded midi files and other shit made the pages take FOREVER ->

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to load, while HTML-only pages would load in the kind of time we expect over our broadband connections now.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0