“If they’re allowed to investigate TRUMP, they’re allowed to investigate YOU!” isn’t the “let that sink in” moment they think it is…

Aug 15, 2022 1:10 AM

DaniusJones123

Views

89241

Likes

1205

Dislikes

26

npc

maga

fbi

trump

news

politics

If the FBI raid my shitty apartment for nuclear launch data Imma be pissed if they break my gunpla.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

“They’re carrying out the law!!”

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They've been doing this to poor people all along. Like Breonna Taylor. they're just mad it's happened to their golden god.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

holy fuck what’s with all the trump posts lately

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I mean, we literally protested because cops shot Breonna Taylor in her sleep and you mocked us

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

"THEY'RE GONNA COME FOR YOU TOO!....before we can come for you!"

3 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 0

Do I get to watch them decide if they want to back the blue again? Because January was pretty traumatic and treasonous.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yep, told that to a family member and her expression was the same. no comeback except "its over reach and its illegal" which I responded 1/-

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"its illegal to crime", and she just grab her drink & smokes and left to the patio.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I wish I could have taken a video

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I work in Federal compliance and literally none of these Maga nuts have any fucking clue how any of this works.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

I have a dream. This. This is my dream.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Can’t wait for the real gif of this

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean...yes...thats the point?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just wait until they learn about no-knock warrants.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I noticed no one on the right is saying "Trump is innocent" though. It's all "omg, how can you treat him like a criminal?"

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

No, they're saying he's innocent and being unjustly persecuted. It's actually pretty funny to listen to them.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

my fav is Rand Paul who isn't denying Trump violated the espionage act he's trying to make it retroactively legal for him to break it

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because they know he’s not but allegiance to America doesn’t mean much to them anymore

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The weak an fragile.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, sure. That's the law.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well if I am ever POTUS and take extremely sensitive documents to my home I'll be sure to keep an eye out for the FBI.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can't recall amy republicans complaining when they searched Hillary's email servers.... just saying

3 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

Because they didnt. Hillary turned the server over to the FBI, but only after wiping it. Honestly, she should have been charged as well.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Your opinion is yours, but your statement is factually incorrect. FBI obtained and executed several warrants in the Clinton investigation.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"Rules for thee, not for me" that's the hallmark of fascism...

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Who is Amy Republicans? ?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I guess Comey Barrett decided to just spell it out for the base and get a name change?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let's be fair to this argument, though; A lot of my far-left heroes were also investigated by government agencies even though they didn't do

3 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 1

MLK of all people had an FBI file, and they literally tried to get him to commit suicide. Malcom X, the Black Panthers, etc.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah it's more of a "newsflash asshole they've been doing it this whole time" situation

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

anything wrong. Pete Seeger was blacklisted and investigated and they had a file on him than I was willing to read, and literally all he did

3 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 0

was encourage people to break out of the typical American system and see that there are other options, that peaceful environmentalism can

3 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

actually defeat materialistic consumerism. I'm not saying this excuses Trump, I'm just saying, there is actually some credence to the idea

3 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

When the pendulum swings far enough left or far enough right we eventually meet back in the middle. Hopefully rational thought wins the day

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When in American history has the pendulum actually swung far enough to the left to warrant a correction?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that government agencies can be used to add an air of legitimacy to mcarthy-esque attacks against "the other".

3 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

Yes, US gov't kept files on MLK, John Lennon, Charlie Chaplin etc, but there is a burden of evidence that a search WAS warranted. Trump 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But this wasn’t that. The threat is that a fair legal system is set up that gave him plenty of time before they got a warrant to search

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If anything this is the exact opposite of that. Not only did 45 have to do SOO much to get this far into an investigation it had to be done

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

..and it's the same? ...even similar enough that Hoover-like investigation being similar to executing a search warrant?

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying it's the same, and further in the thread I explained that, but what I am saying is that we need to be careful about using the

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

reasoning that "it was a legal federal action signed-off by legitimate authorities" to add legitimacy to political attacks. In this scenario

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it does seem absolutely legitimate and like all things are in order, but it's the facts of this case that make that true, not the agency.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So if the argument truly is "it was a legal federal action signed-off by legitimate authorities", that's dangerous thinking for any radical.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Let's be fair to this argument, though; "...and then give an specious example hinting similarity.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So the Palmer raids weren't real? McCarthyism didn't happen? Pete Seeger's FBI file isn't 1800 pages long? I gave you real examples.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You were equating them Champ.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I say this as a far-left radical who'd rather see a socialist revolution in the US. I'd like to be able to say that without legitimate

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0