protective boot

Jan 9, 2024 10:59 AM

kotc

Views

1351

Likes

18

Dislikes

3

prote

it's not a bug, it's a feature

ethernet

design_fail

They want you to go in raw without protection..

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Iirc, Cisco's solution to this problem was to call cables with protective boots stupid and just warn off using them.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There's...theres no way. This cant be real, right? If it is then theres a Cisco engineer that is sure to get a brick through their window by a Net Admin who accidentally took down the corporate network just trying to locate where E/1 goes.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Very likely the switch was designed before connectors with protective boots were. None of the cables in my server rooms had em back when I was a sysadmin.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2017 if i googled it right, looks like cisco catalyst 9300 series

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not going to go on defending it, it's a dumb design to have a protruding reset button there regardless of the connector. That said 1U switch fascia's haven't really change that much in over 20 years. As a former sysadmin I hate those protective boot connectors and they are more trouble than their worth in a professional setting.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

erm, actually 9300 looks like fixed version of C3850 :)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0