The Real Cost of Your AI Use, Inside a Power-Hungry Data Center

Aug 9, 2025 6:36 PM

Grogu007

Views

372202

Likes

608

Dislikes

8

Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRNVc3-XGFg
Credit : WSJ’s Joanna Stern She is phenomenal, she did a great research on iPhone thefts leading to people losing their bank accounts that led to an iPhone update.
She does great work

Other stuff
Conan Norm MacDonald https://imgur.com/gallery/eFWDAGBhttps://imgur.com/gallery/QFl0JtF
https://imgur.com/gallery/rS7AXcL
https://imgur.com/gallery/ZqNFxns

woahdude

technology

current_events

the_more_you_know

artificial_intelligence

And all that energy just to tell me to eat rocks.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There are so many of these god damned things going in or already operating here in northern Virginia. I can't wait for the resources of the world to be poured into something whose only purpose is to allow the wealthy to remove even more of the cost of labor from the balance sheets.

The future fucking suck!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Data centers were a bad guy a few years ago for bitcoin mining. AI has made us forget that. Hmm.

Computer servers make huge amounts of waste heat. We should be able to use that heat.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I live and do work at those datacenters in northern Virginia.... there is so many datacenters here its kinda crazy the square milage of datacenters

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Since AI is so great, let's start talk about replacing congress with it, and see how far that goes

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s the next step in the plan.

2 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One thing that never gets explained in these is what happens to the water? I know it's used for cooling, but I would have assumed it to be a closed system where water doesn't just gtfo and gets reused, which would be very different than irretrievably consuming x amount of water in some way.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Depends on the system. None of it is "irretrievably consumed," of course, because water doesn't work that way. Most recirculate the water through cooling towers, letting some evaporate into the air before reusing it for another round of cooling, which continues until the mineral content of the water becomes too high. Others have active cooling systems that they circulate the water through. "Once through" cooling that just dumps it back into the environment is pretty rare these days.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In an ideal world, groups of people would target the data centres, put them out of action and help save the planet, however we now have a world where US government kidnaps people off the street to put into concentration camps and noone lifts a finger.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

We are doomed and I hate it here.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

part of it is not even our fault, Google and Bing by default show an "AI summary" which also has the negative effect of not giving the needed clicks to the sources where the summaries are generated from. Even Duck Duck Go is not safe but at least they don't do it by default.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

can it run crysis?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do a thing and this happens. What if make a movie for 5 years and I have to drive and feed myself?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

At some point we will arrive at those human farms to produce power to run the AI as in the Matrix.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wave hello children of the future, this is going to be your teacher from grade school until college!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Way back in the before times I was a SysOp in a machine room running 15 DECVax 7000 minicomputers. The environment was monitored for temp & humidity and the techs could never figure out why humidity was spiking on Thursday evenings, between about 7:30 and 10. It was because my shift mate Gary did his washing before starting his shift at 7, and he hung it up behind the exhaust ports to dry.

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Classic Gary.

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 weeks ago (deleted Aug 9, 2025 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes the planet would be better off with no humans and just AI. Let's start with you.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Lol nice try

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Oh right, the "AI uses less energy than human writers or artists" argument. Yes, the AI industry actually went there. Because humans will just stop eating and heating and showering after being replaced by AI. Everyone knows when people are laid off, they go sit in a corner somewhere and starve themselves to death. Idiot.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Americans and using any unit but metric... "How much energy does one search use?" About a medium rare steak.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This will breed a nation of idiots and spread misinformation like no one has imagined, and all at the expense of the same people it’s hurting. Fuck carbon emissions or increased energy use, just the dystopian world that Zuckerberg and every parasite tech bro envisioned.

3 weeks ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 2

Thats their goal. Idiots who can be ruled over

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plus, if no one reads books or whole articles to get context, they won't remember any facts.
It will be easy for AI to do a Trump and spew any old crap out and they'll remember that though, and will be harder to spot.

3 weeks ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

how so then how much steak does 1 hour of helldivers on a 3080 consume?

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Vastly more than any number of AI queries that you could generate in an hour. For all the noise about AI power usage, a ChatGPT query eats about 0.3 watt-hours of electricity. That means that if you're reading this on a laptop, you're burning roughly the equivalent of 4.5 ChatGPT queries every single minute just to run your laptop. A high-end desktop? Easily 50 queries a minute.

Five minutes of Googling burns way more power than simply asking ChatGPT. Perspective is important.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

why does the user device matter? the AI isn't running on that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because it's still consuming energy. People freak out about the electrical usage without realizing it's only one tiny amount in a vast chain of devices that consume electricity in order to connect you to the internet. I mean, this isn't even getting into the many OTHER data centers that sit between you and the server, all of which have to be burning 24/7 just to keep the internet up and running, which have nothing particularly to do with AI.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes the device would be on and running regardless if used for AI query or a regular search and as u correctly stated all the devices in the chain need to be running aswell. so that part of power consumption wont change. at that point we are arguing whether or not to use the internet; not about what difference using AI or not will do to the power consumption. only those parts in the chain that actually change when using AI compared to other tools are interesting for the comparison, right?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you may be right about the words... but the images and video's have extremely higher costs... and thats what the content was about.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not that much. Even the WSJ's highest possible estimate runs about 1 kilowatt-hour for an elaborate 60 second high quality video. That sounds like a lot, but again, it's what a high end desktop burns in an hour; and you would spend a LOT more than an hour manually creating CGI and visual effects for a 60 second clip. This is a sticker-shock thing because people don't really understand the electrical "cost" of everyday activities.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah. I like that there is a comparison to SOMETHING in the video, although steak is really fucking abstract. I would rather see things like gaming, or AI in a self driving car, or lights in a stadium, or and average home's air conditioning system, and would rather see like five separate things each compared. Because number of steaks grilled means next to nothing to me. Its like the least intuitive example I could think of lol.

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

6-8 hours of helldiving is 1 steak. Not too bad

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I think the more important question you need to ask is how many football fields will those cooked steaks cover?

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How many large boulders the size of small boulders does it weigh?

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

asking the real questions

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Atleast 3 half-full waching machines

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nowncompare that to the costs of the servers you make use of for general social media. It's not much different.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Trump made deal with EU, for them to buy energy, which likely will increase prices too.

Europe have been working hard to find new sources since Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Guess Europeans will be managing to keep energy prices down, at the cost of increasing US domestic energy prices.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much energy did this video creation use?

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

The energy demand of filming and editing digital video is negligible in comparison to, say, rendering 3D video content (aka CGI). Producing a mere 5 minutes of CGI on an average home PC can take anywhere from several hours to multiple days depending on the complexity of the scene and the required quality. And AI video requires even more computing power. Hence these giant data centers with multiple parallel GPUs per server. Video editing on your home PC is a tiny drop in the bucket in comparison.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

so let me add a point. The "video creation" and "video distribution" part is same for AI and non AI videos. AI consume additional power that is much much higher

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I'm talking about the dancing steak.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They answered that in the video. Didn't you watch it?

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

+ sending it to hundreds of thousands of homes and playback energy consumption, of course.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

so let me add a point. The "video creation" and "video distribution" part is same for AI and non AI videos. AI consume additional power that is much much higher

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No, it actually isn't. AI video generation requires only the computer. Filming something requires a great deal of equipment.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Machines taking over just like Archie Bunker said.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lazy

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

And I don't even Want this shit! It's being shoved down our throats against our will. Google won't let me opt out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Get an app/add-on that can block parts of pages to block the A.I. slop.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

The solution is to opt out of Google. Jump through the required hoops to clean as much of the crap out of your phone as you can and install Google free alternatives.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

They are pouring money into this in the hopes of replacing an ever increasing part of the labor costs with Ai, who won't complain works all day and won't unionize.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just add “-ai” to whatever you google

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imagine when the A.I. fad quickly dies and these data centers crash hard. Better sell your stocks in the companies that run them soon.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Imagine knowing so little about AI and how long these technologies have been around that you think it's a fad that's about to crash.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now do one about the NSA data centers that hoard everything that is done on any US based website. Funny how journalists rarely cover that, almost like there's some kind of...incentive...not to draw attention to it. I wonder why

3 weeks ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 16

Incentive or fear of retaliation?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Useless fucking shit. Stealing our shit. Killing us all.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

fern on Youtube did one about the NY one the other day. Nothing about power consumption though, but interesting anyway.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You only know about the NSA data centers because journalists covered it...

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That's a real old story. While i agree it's not known about widely enough, it's not exactly surprising news to anyone who knows about the NSA-a government branch specifically created to observe law abiding citizens- might be doing that ON THE INTERNET.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Umm because this uses significantly more power, which is the issue covered in the video

3 weeks ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

it doesn't though. AI uses more power than not doing AI, but hoarding EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF DATA ON THE ENTIRE PLANET takes more power than the AI used by one private company does. The NSA has THREE data centers that are larger than about a third of all US cities.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 21

That size comparison is horrible. If you take out the huge outliers like L.A. and New York the average population of cities in the US is less than 5000. With half of those having a population of a few hundred. My rurel high school was probably bigger than a third of the cities in the US.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This size comparison makes no sense

3 weeks ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Nonsense

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

NSA has three data centers? That’s basically nothing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I just did an eight day drive through the continental US, about 65 hours total driving a lazy loop from CA to MO back to CA, passing through like 10 states. You would not BELIEVE how many "cities" there are out there between major cities that have populations of like 20-50 people. I'm not sure if you meant that statistic to sound impressive, but with the recency of that experience it does not.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone on my local radio station (Joss, Tucson MixFM) said on radio that she used chatgpt to convert US$ to Yen. The sheer stupidity was just wild to me. There are probably thousands of applications or websites that could have done this without wasting as much resources as she did converting 3000$ to yen.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually no, using any website or app would have at least as much energy usage as ChatGPT. Your laptop is going to burn more power in the time it takes you to find a website than it takes to make the query.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, AI servers use electricity. So do conventional server farms, which consume about ten times as much. So, for that matter, does literally every other industry. At my job there is a single fan on one of our larger pieces of equipment that burns as much electricity in one 8 hour shift as an average home does in an entire month. But that's part of how condensed milk is made. You can take anything out of context to make it sound scary.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The water consumption, considering i live in a desert and am currently fighting against a data center they are trying to build right now in my desert, is my biggest concern right now. The electricity is shit but the water is insane.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bear in mind it's not like data centers suck up drinking water, use it once, then dump it in the trash never to be used again. They recirculate cooling water, running it through cooling towers or active refrigeration systems to reuse it, only replacing it with fresh water when evaporation results in the mineral content of the water getting too high. Also, newer data center designs lose about 1/20th as much water as older ones do. Many also use non-drinkable or recycled water.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry Texans, my goth Angorian maid fanfiction isn't going to create itself.

3 weeks ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 7

made that post a few weeks ago /gallery/just-like-paper-straws-us-private-jets-rich-MhDAjVx some were defending AI companies lol

3 weeks ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Sorry, Texans

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Is that one of those lusty argonian maids I hear so much about?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I want scales and green on everything, do it again.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But the showers!

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0