Serial downvote stalkers trying to kill posts in usersub.  Notice the pattern - they are afraid

Jul 15, 2025 12:46 AM

1stTimerAgain

Views

44862

Likes

1186

Dislikes

215

seriously_though_wtf

politics

afraid of what ???

3 weeks ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

Afraid of social media posts, apparently...

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

OP: refuses to tag their posts

Also OP: must be Russian bots 🤷🏻‍♀️

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

3 weeks ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 23

just had a look, they're tagged, tf you talking about?

3 weeks ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

Using other tags to bypass filters, really.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I usually downvote political stuff regardless of whether I agree or disagree with it. I already have enough of that crap thrown at me in news and everywhere else. I come here for the meme dumps and funny stories.

3 weeks ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 19

I've found it's much less effort to simply browse the meme dump tags, but ok

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 12

I don't know, I tend to find myself some epicaricacy in downvoting political shit.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Glancing at the profile, this looks to be a politically focused and charged account and a lot of imgur is kinda burnt out on this becoming FB2 in doom news :( especially if you are intentionally avoiding the politics tag

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

what pattern? downvoting content they don't wanna see on the front page? that's kinda the model

3 weeks ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 12

The other day I saw an untagged graphic political post about SA in Gaza. I've had to leave imgur repeatedly because people not tagging their activism is harmful to my mental health, like being beaten over the head with the worst of the worst that you're already aware of when I am already on your side

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

So to be blunt: There's a flood of new accounts posting left wing things in order to get upvotes quickly and do the good ol fashion: "Sell of account and/or post dodgy links later" move. So that's probably why some of them get downvotes. Not to mention some of the accounts posting these things have shown to be incredibly aggressive towards other users. I've asked some simple questions to check if they're human and gotten sexual assaulty comments thrown my way.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Seems like I saw this more back in the fall. Before the election. But they would also come with 1 liner insults on anything anti tRump. New accts. Were they trying to get the imgur algorithm to shit can liberal, logical &/or anti tRump anything? (Start the wave and let the algorithm finish it off?)

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

What? The purchased Bot account that doesn’t properly tag its posts? I’m shocked, shocked I say

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Imgur are helping them by suspending accounts that tell the truth like ICE are terrorists just like the filthy isrealies

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not everyone wants to see American politics every other post in one of the few escapes from reality left online.

Literally just tag your posts. Yes, they are political (as is stated that "everything is political" time and time again). No, they are not an exception. No, it's not some massive plot to undermine the fabric of free press and liberty. That's all it would require. This stopped being a conspiracy/mystery years ago.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Another thing that stands out to me is the "this is important to me" factor, where their pet issue must be put in front of eyeballs, must be observed, must be supported/followed (or otherwise you're a bad person), and some are more obnoxious about that than others.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

UPVOTED!

3 weeks ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 25

Downvoted!

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Ohhhhh yeah I have a bad case of the serial downvoter stalkers too, for a while but especially in recent times. Looks like they go after anyone posting stuff against fascism/Trump.

3 weeks ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 27

Five downvotes and counting 😜

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 18

Complaining about getting downvoted is a self-fulfilling prophecy

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

Reposting bot reposts low quality click/rage bait, doesn't tag 'politics', downvote bots downvote, comment bots comment, upvote bots upvote, Keith, Garth, Seth and Beth, the only four human users on imgur, move on trying to find cat pictures.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Or maybe people just downvote your low effort doom spam.

3 weeks ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 17

My experience too- regarding Israel and human rights, and especially animal rights- some guy downvoted every one of my comments for an entire year- including my profile history- think they are professional operatives

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

I've been getting a lot of (I feel) unfair downvotes but none of my comments or posts are about politics so who knows.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

I downvote all political posts. So get mad at me if you want. idc.

3 weeks ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 21

They've been out in wild force for a while now.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

A lot of people on here are very tired of the polemics and dv anything political. Tag your posts.

3 weeks ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 26

i dunno, I had a look and their stuff is indeed tagged. if there's something in particular someone is coming here for, there's tags so you can find exactly that without the fuss. 🤷 so many people quick to say "TaG yOuR pOsT" without even checking if they do.

3 weeks ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

"seriously though wtf" isn't tagging your political post as politics. It's just as bad as not tagging them at all, but with the added obnoxiousness of being able to say "see, I tagged it".

For real, so many political posts are given the most irrelevant tags just to bypass filters. Fuck those people.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

They're in full force today, even for some tagged posted.

3 weeks ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 61

“We don’t want you to think like that so we built machines that cost as much as a fully loaded Ferrari for every human operator, cuz boooo we don’t want you to think your good people thoughts, only do you what WE say”

3 weeks ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

As for that picture, we had something like that at my old job, it would run our app and take screenshots of every page on every major phone. Then QA would flag any photo that had a broken UI element

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sorry I'm dumb. You were doing this to test your own app for glitches and bugs, did I get it right?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Correct! We built an app that we wanted to make sure worked on every phone. Without getting too complicated, different phone manufacturers (think, Samsung or pixel) will change how certain "standard" UI elements display. So we had to test every page of our app on every phone by every major manufacturer

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

holy wow... source please? this is horrific

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

ah, that's a phone farm for selling engagement on social media, they're woefully common and usually get their hardware by advertising themselves as phone recyclers that imply that you're selling your older phone to be refurbished and sold to somebody who doesn't mind it being an older model. for some reason it's cheaper to just buy actual outdated hardware (usually with cracked screens) than to emulate the firmware and software on a rack mounted server.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I think there's also that it's running on real hardware that makes it appear more genuine, google for example has put in a ton of effort for their "web environment integrity" within their browsers and that they want more broadly adopted. Still, one thing I find interesting is that when there's some message to be pushed it's always the 'other team' that uses bot farms, and 'my team' would never stoop so low to buy their services, for whatever issues are accepted on a platform.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure I downvoted a bunch of your posts because you don't tag them.

3 weeks ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 16

Yet when i complain about the apolitical losers who come on here just for girl pics not tagging their posts properly im the problem lol.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

No we downvote those too. Untagged = downvote

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The fun fact is that both people taking a break and people who are practicing avoidance will have essentially the same response to being non consensually violated with political excrement; they quickly come to despise those who force themselves upon them. Their actions are similar to peta blocking the meat isle and pouring out milk to protest animal abuse.

The root of the matter here is that by participating in this you are alienating potential allies.

You are better than this.

Do better.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Both are problems. Tag your shit.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Everyone should tag their posts, that's the whole point of this site. Aside from that I am plenty political - but I prefer to get my news from actual news sources and not image dumps.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remember when iMgur was a Picture sharing site? And we would share Pictures?

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

And the top comments would be the most appropiate and funny made up titles to the picture!

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

First Comment meant something! Other than First!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

there is also the very real possibility that something entirely different is going on... for example.. when you post fucked up shit someone did, perhaps people feel like giving that a upvote is condoning the stupid shit you posted about. Another possibility is maybe some people just come here for cat memes and are upset by this crap and think downvoting will keep that shit off their screen.

3 weeks ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

I come to imgur to get away from politics. Idc what side you're on here. I just want to see funny cat pictures and other light stuff. Please TAG YOUR POSTS. Its not a conspiracy. We just want to take a break from the horrors of the world. Thanks.

3 weeks ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 31

Don’t fucking click and downvote them then. Easy enough to just see cat pics.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Look, I get it, and from a data-organization perspective, I especially agree. Posts should be tagged as well as the poster is able. Also, we should be allowed to take a break from thinking about all the bad things happening. I wish there was a way to seperate the people taking a break from the people practicing avoidance, but there isn't. The best we can do is vote up or down and hope that it works out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The fun fact is that both people taking a break and people who are practicing avoidance will have essentially the same response to being non consensually violated with political excrement; they quickly come to despise those who force themselves upon them. Their actions are similar to peta blocking the meat isle and pouring out milk to protest animal abuse.

The root of the matter here is that by participating in this you are alienating potential allies. You are better than this. Do better.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yes, but when the person in question *does* tag their shit, it's not a good look to suggest they do what they're already doing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Yeah 'current events'. It may not be I correct but if you check their post history it's all politics posts, so why not use the politics tag which I know is what a lot of people have blocked?

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

definitely worth suggesting, I'm with you, it's just disappointing to see people suggesting a solution to something without even checking if it's applicable to that particular case.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Ops likely not even a real person

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I'm with you. I'll get my news from legitimate news sources when I'm ready, not some rando sharing a meme. Yes, shit sucks right now, but not everything in the world has to remind me of that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 11

"not some rando sharing a meme"... so much this. The tiktok/imgur/reddit/twitter/etc regime of a talking head mouthing off about some newsworthy event/person is banal and meaningless by virtue of the medium having no credibility. If I go to a news source I can verify the bone fides of everyone from the source itself (eg, CNN, Fox etc) right down to the "reporter" who wrote/presented the article. Can't do that on imgur.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That concept seems to be really difficult for people on imgur to grasp.

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

This has been a sponsored post from #tagyourdamnshit

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

KeEp StIcKiNg yUoR hEaD iN tHe SaNd! WhAt DoEs LeAtHeR tAsTe LiKe?

(/s in case that wasn't clear)

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Sounds like someone needs to keep calm and #tagyourdamnshit

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a grouchy older millennial that hates tags... But I'm learning to use them for exactly this. My rare post gets a dozen interactions. Which is great for me because I don't need fake Internet points. It's fun to do sometimes. Maybe one day my cat will do something that makes people happy

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Cat tax is now due. :)

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No escaping the tax

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reminder, it's mostly one loser

3 weeks ago | Likes 389 Dislikes 68

3 weeks ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

Sounds exactly like the Catholic League back in the early 2000s. One sad shill.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Back when Imgur actually tried to combat this. Spock was a good egg. Shame they fired him to save a buck.

3 weeks ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 10

I try to manually combat bots and work with other users to out them. There's some simple implementations IMGUR could do to reduce it, but as you mentioned they'd rather save a buck...

3 weeks ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

It couldn't be hard to rig up a botnet of your own to do exactly that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When I start using bots after years of outing them:

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wise is the warrior who uses the enemies strengths against him.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's bots all the way down...

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's actually really pathetic.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Seems like you could see which users accessed it before the downvote storm

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Too bad Spock is gone and no one else cares.

3 weeks ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 8

That's what happens when an advertising company runs things.

3 weeks ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 2

Multiverse Spock is here.

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

I was gonna say they may be aware of it but they do absolutely nothing about the bots are “old” accounts that suspiciously have high karma but all their old posts are deleted with every new post the my make being suspiciously and heavily political to the point of being misleading at times

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Wild

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There needs to be account validation and a time limit on when people become eligible to up/downvote. 24-48 hours would work, maybe 72, and while that only slows the process, it would give imgur time to view the patterns to see where they're signed in from.

Email validation, points, and an account age mandatory. If any one of those three doesn't happen, especially email validation, then they can't make that many accounts without being sniffed out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 6

Could also link each account to the up/downvote, in that if you vote at all then the server has a list of each person who touched one of those buttons. This definitely should NOT be used in ANY way to harvest ANY information for profit; imgur needs to use it as a safeguard.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

They already track who votes and how. That's why you can't upvote a post twice, and something you come back to much later retains its state.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

While a nice idea this is a bit dated. I was was looking at an article about this and bots are 'farmed' - created, curated, matured and integrated in the millions _years_ in advance, like cheese wheels. There's an entire ecosystem in creating, nurturing and then selling these bots. So modern bots will evade all your protections mentioned.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yes, that's why I said that it only slows the process. It would, however, give imgur enough time in each instance to gather evidence and take action, whether on their site or legally. And based on what that image is saying, it's only one guy who creates the accounts and then deletes them. If he's creating them on a whim then this process will slow and usersub will be safe(ish).

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fair call, any positive action is not negative. I'd just like to see a more effective approach. And if I knew what that was, I could sell it for millions.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol yeah. Engineers and Architects have tried myriads of methods, and IP banning is ultimately the "best" resolution but that comes with the problem of VPN. imgur could potentially block all VPN usage but there are still ways around that.

Outside of internet and technology, the next best option is to pursue legal action, which is what they're talking about in that screenshot. If they can figure out who's doing it then they could potentially take legal action.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is a very sad lonely and pathetic person if they have that kind of time to just make accounts and downvotes. I mean it's likely bots but if one person is taking that time, lordy

3 weeks ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Or Russia has only assigned one guy to all of imgur.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah I think it's one dude just controlling all the bots most likely. Definitely a dude that needs a better hobby

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I mean it might be his job. They do pay people to do things like that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1) It's one guy. I used to keep tabs on a bunch of his accounts that I knew about, seeing them all make the same jokes, use the same turn of phrase, talk about owning the same breed of dog, living in the same area of the country, using the same reactions gifs, liking the same subjects, and all of them would stop posting at around the same time when he'd be on vacation or busy on a long weekend or something. As for his shitty hobby, next comment has some quotes from some of his old accounts:

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

2)

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How sad. Having nothing else to do but make multiple accounts and be a douche. I think I saw a guy earlier who was doing the same thing 2 different accounts exact same sentence

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

little conspiracy theory feeling

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

This kind of thing more common than you would think. I was a moderator on the Minecraft Forum and there was a handful of "like-minded individuals" that seemed to generally agree with each other on various things, all with different posting styles.

Until one account slipped up and caused us to take a harder look at them. Turns out all of them were one guy, who was operating a half-dozen accounts just to reinforce their opinions within the community. Each account had thousands of posts, and 1/2

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

All the posts were created manually, as this was well before Chat GPT was a thing.

Some people get really fucking weird about stuff online, so it absolutely wouldn't surprise me if someone has written a script for downvoting things en masse. It wouldn't be very hard to do for someone with moderate programming ability.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

i mean sure its easy enough, but to bother with all the IP based limited API stuff Imgur does, feels like a hassle. for whats going to be still failry easily detectable.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Just cuz you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you!

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Just cause they aren't typing bark, doesn't mean they aren't dogs.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is a small sample size and a biased selection. If this is your experiment, you'll need to provide additional data on alternate topics.

3 weeks ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 19

OP is also posting analytics from multiple different accounts that tend to follow very similar behaviours... Almost like they're all from the same person...

3 weeks ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Suck me, shill.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Then present, bias cherry picker.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are absolutely bots that try to control what gets popular.

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I.e. Do they downvote that much on pictures of selfies? On tumblr posts? On right-wing articles? Is it politics in general?

3 weeks ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 3

Yup. Need a control. Same time of day? How does the same post change from user to user? There are about 50 things to make this a legit look at what's happening.

3 weeks ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Well, that's the whole point of peer review. To poke as many holes as possible so it's iron clad.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That and you need to account for the people that downvote literally anything political because they don't think Imgur should be for that, and they number quite a few. It's not that they agree or disagree, they just don't want politics. Then you have people who downvote because of post quality, maybe the title is bad, maybe its untagged, maybe there's no source.

How can you tell what the downvotes are for?

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

There's a subset of that group that primarily target untagged posts. You can filter out political posts that are tagged but not ones that aren't.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's easy to make correlations when 80% of downvotes happen in the span of 15 minutes.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well that could be the fact people browsing newest posts are going to see new posts. Then the post will end up in a middle area, not popular or new.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm also not pulling this out of my ass. Mods are aware of it, others have noticed it. Check through some of the other comments on here. This is a known problem.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is a SUSPECTED pattern. I mis-trust something we all know yet can't point to a valid study or experiment for proof.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just checked your post history. You're using 'current events' for your politics posts. While maybe not incorrect I understand why people that have the oolitica tag locked down vote your post if they see it. Use the politics tag and respect block lists, and your downvotes problem is no more.

3 weeks ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 14

current events is literally a political tag, if you've selected the "show me less politics" option in the filters that'll include current events, so the people complaining in these posts shouldn't even see the post and are lying that they've filtered politics. Their aim is to get more people to filter politics. Why they're doing that I'll let you work out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because reposting screencaps is almost like direct action?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not everything is a conspiracy damn.. you sound like everyone's crazy uncle. I filter politics, but not current events, as if there's a wildfire or hurricane, I don't mind a post about it. I just don't need 200 posts a day about how trump is a shit human.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

ok 1 don't get your wildfire news from imgur, and 2 please shut the fuck up about imgur not being how you want it to be if the problem you're having is because you choose to ignore the tools that were made explicitly because enough people like you threw this exact tantrum. The posts are tagged, fix your settings.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the entire premise of imgur is you upvote content you like, and downvote content you dont like. By that premise, if I've already done the work and filtered content, and then I do upvote/downvote content. I think there's no problem here, minus the conspiracy theorists who want to make this into something it clearly is not.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

except you haven't done the work and are a dummy.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

In many cases posts like those are untagged and they get big downvotes from people that use tags.

3 weeks ago | Likes 281 Dislikes 33

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 weeks ago (deleted Jul 15, 2025 1:06 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And if you do it more than once they’ll hunt down your other posts.

3 weeks ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 10

How...friendly & open & welcoming....

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, if they're a serial antitagger I just mute them.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Also if it was natural downvotes they wouldn't all hit at once.

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

Exactly. I experienced swarms.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I downvote untagged political posts, but only when they cross my feed. I don't intentionally hunt them down because I don't want to see them to begin with, which is why I have most political tags blocked.

3 weeks ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 19

I totally understand. I down vote anyone that whines about tags. I can't just let them share imgur, post or comment whatever they want, I make sure they know my personal preferences and demand to be given priority.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 56

I'm with you. People whining about tagging your post are frustrating. You're not required to tag and it seems pretty entitled to demand folks tag stuff because you don't like politics,not whatever.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... you downvote yourself? Just asking since this definitely comes across as whining about tags.

3 weeks ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

I held up a mirror and many of you did not like what you saw.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I was tagging all my political posts and they went after me anyway. They're just assholes.

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

Different assholes lol. I down vote any political posts I see on my feed, because I've blocked political tags, so if you get down voted with tags, it's a different group

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

It happens if you tag posts with politics. ~11-35 downvotes all within about 15 minutes.

3 weeks ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 10

It's most likely both if we're being realistic. The numbers though are what would be interesting to see, if anyone is passionate about making statistics with more than handful of posts from several different people.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Many of my posts are about news and politics and I started tagging them because I was tired of people complaining about knowing Earth is found to Hell.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So if you tag a completely non political post with #politics does it still happen? Is it tag based or keyword based?

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm not sure, I haven't tried. I do know that any post I make that gets tagged politics gets the same thing, and others have also noticed it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

thank you! there's a bunch of people telling op to tag, but I had a look and, lo and behold, everything I checked was tagged. QQ go browse #memedump and #funny, it's less effort for you and less headache for the rest of us.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Check some of the users demanding tags. I've seen some that are brand new accounts and demanding tags is all they do. They want to limit messaging, even here.

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

I'm sorry, but how does asking people to use the tagging feature limit messaging? Unless you feel so entitled that everyone must know your politics expressed through totally real social media screenshot. Much like religion and genitals, don't shove it down my throat

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Because if you tag your posts politics, it suffers an immediate bot-downvote campaign. If you don't, it actually gets seen.

Considering that you're one of those accounts who's majority of comments is about people tagging, I'm pretty sure you already know this.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Other way around, those brigade accounts follow tags and that's why people often don't tag.

3 weeks ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 29

Sounds like a conspiracy theory. Tags are simple and help the community.

3 weeks ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 24

There literally is a dude who checks the politics tag specifically to brigade dowvote them, because the tag makes them easy to find

3 weeks ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 10

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

It's not "conspiracy". I had a ton of political posts and I tagged religiously. With a minute or two of posting they'd swarm. It didn't happen at first - only once my posts started going "viral" regularly did I end up on someone's list.

3 weeks ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

Also just look at the comments, I was at positive votes until they replied to me then suddenly 24 more downvotes hit. Always enough to counter the upvotes I got. It's a standard pattern lots of people have called out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

And someone already downvoted you. It's all so petty.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tags also make it easy to abuse what makes it to FP.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Good. Too many spambots.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

No, actually. You realize that these bots are the cause of the tagging problem, while you guys are railing against the symptom? The fact that the tags can be used to manipulate what makes FP seems to be exactly the opposite of what you want. If tagging something with "politics" didn't come with a near-automatic penalization, there wouldn't be any controversy about telling people to tag their shit. Corner cases would get updated as they do now, and you'd see 0 politics on FP if your filter's set.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4