TIL what these signs below the windows mean

Jan 27, 2019 5:55 PM

Justtoberight

Views

151899

Likes

5355

Dislikes

31

I've seen them a few times while strolling around London, but I've never fully understood what "ancient lights" means. I thought it may be a historic building under some sort of preservation order...

Turns out, the sign refers to the English "Right to Light"-Law that gives a long-standing owner of a building with windows a right to maintain the level of illumination.

So it has nothing to do with historic street lamps... It means that the owner of a building with windows that have received natural daylight for 20 years or more is entitled to forbid any construction or other obstruction that would deprive him or her of that illumination. Neighbours cannot build anything that would block the light without permission. The owner may build more or larger windows but cannot enlarge their new windows before the new period of 20 years has expired.

There is actually a map of all the places in London protected under this law https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1LbMDY8ArklFbDeDHrNSPnx1T8Yo&ll=51.52102588058153%2C-0.08045650000008209&z=13

TIL sauce: https://twitter.com/UrbanFoxxxx/status/1087707584331685888

themoreyouknow

til

interesting_facts

That’s an amazing law!!! I love sunlight!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is a tax on natural light in England. Now you can see why the US colonies left.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

thanks for shedding some light on the issue...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

+1 I used to have lake view from my apartment balcony. I'm so pissed off about losing that.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In London the views of St Paul’s are protected. It’s the reason we have some interesting looking sky scrapers

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds like they could be worked into a good old fashion English murder mystery.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Learn something new every day.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and all I can think of was that "Fries-bag" building that made burned up the lower neighbourhood on sunny days in London...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was watching UK's bad neighbors series and one lady kept yelling her neighbor's extension took away her right to light. I was wondering.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TIL what TIL means

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there must be some angle or below which is acceptable

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a quality TIL +1

6 years ago | Likes 1371 Dislikes 2

What does TIL stand for?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Today I got learnt

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Today I Learned. The one that drove me nutz was MRW, My Reaction When.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Today i learned.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Is there a Right To Light law in Ireland?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jan 28, 2019 7:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Sorry but I think you need to look up what is part of the UK and what is not. Northern Ireland and Ireland are two different places

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. I’m aware. Just because it’s all over UK doesn’t necessarily exclude other places...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You just made a lot of people very angry, and at least one laugh

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Right To Light extends across the UK. We’re pretty cool over here with quality of life, Free Healthcare etc...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Free*

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I was on vacay in the UK (from the US) and had my first ever cluster headache. Friend there, who is a nurse, insisted i go to the hospital>

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freaked out b/c not a lot of money. Great healthcare I've ever had and no $5,000 bill, i was amazed.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

healthcare isnt free, what do you think your national insurance pays for

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

it s more like pre-paid healthcare

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Not really is it...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

When people say 'free healthcare', they are generally referring to no upfront/after fees (eg: the US's system).

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Mmmm no. I had a motorcycle accident in the US - cost £2575 for a fucking broken wrist. Same injury in the UK costs nothing!!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just because there were no upfront/after fees, dosn't mean there was no cost. It was paid for by taxes, not by fairies.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yes there was a cost! I HAD TO PAY FOR THE HEALTHCARE!!! If you were a foreign national in the UK for the same accident you wouldn’t pay!!!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or Mexicans for a Wall. Fuck off dickhead.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

National insurance was introduced in The UK to cover the State Pension. Also another fantastic benefit of living in the UK..

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ok, but taxes still pay for the NHS so it isnt free, and a state pension of 7,700 a year is a joke

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That’s not even close to be true..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what isnt true?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Everyone here applauding building restrictions, remember: that is a large part of why rent is so high.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I lived in London for most of my life. Never herd of this, nor seen signs around

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Physical graffiti

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Came to say exactly that, checked the comments first. Have an upvote! +1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Funny... could Licht (German for light) be a misread letter due to a weird font? LICHT LIGHT . See?!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

yeah most English is just "really bad German". In Scots English you find things like "ken" to know someone, in German same verb = "kennen"

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Indogermanic languages yeyyyyyy

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In Holland, windmills have the right to wind. Same: cannot build so high around it that it takes wind away. Windmills can forfeit that right

6 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 1

That's actually really cool

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Windmills can't function without wind, so it makes sense.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jul 23, 2019 9:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How can i grow if you dont let me blow?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Most antique mills are for show, but here a flour mill is used in production, with no wind a single stroke diesel turns the blades.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The best thing about windmills is we used to drain lakes with them. Now we make pancakes.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heard of ‘day light robbery’? It’s not what you think but this is relevant

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Enlarge their windows. They make pills for that right?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like air rights or something like we have in US

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need that here in the US!

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 8

You don't own the view over my land. This will cause urban sprawl, increased housing prices, commute times, & carbon emissions.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

“Unanimously repudiated in the US” - 1959 Although San Francisco has proposition K, to do with shadows cast on public parks

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

San Francisco has some similar laws about creating shadows over certain parks

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. You and the rest of us need modern, energy efficient homes.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

It said "page not found" but then I realized I had to delete the extra bracket in the end. thanks for the link!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We have a lot of zoning restrictions in the US - it's why rent in our cities is so high.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The gentrification doesn't help, either.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If people build enough housing to satisfy demand in more desirable neighborhoods, people don't move into lower-income ones.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As someone who studied historic preservation in the US I find this genuinely interesting

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Led Zeppelin Physical Graffiti

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

London: Has law that restricts others from blocking the light entering windows. Tennant: Keeps shades down and blinds closed.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Maybe they are just not home

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And by 'not home' you mean 'watching porn'?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can assume that I'm watching porn anytime I'm at home. In fact, I have it on my answering machine.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You have porn on your answering machine? "Please leave a message at the sound of the moan"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m not home an awful lot these days.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True. Might be sleeping too.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So 20 years is ancient.... Okk

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is brilliant. I’ve lived in London for years and never even spotted them! +1!!!

6 years ago | Likes 615 Dislikes 1

Well, if I ever want to go to London and become a skulking serial killer, now I know all the best places to hide...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Likewise, I had no idea lol

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some can be seen near Chinatown and Covent Garden

6 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 1

I shall keen my eyes peeled! Thanks :)

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

It's also the reason the older section of Broadcasting House has a weird shape of the roof on the side nearest the new bit - there 1

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

was an ancient lights issue on that side. Now it's not an issue as the BBC have the new building there. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

http://www.orbem.co.uk/bh32/bh32_e.htm about half way down has early photos showing the slope to avoid the rights of light

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Must need a spotlight

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was about to say the same!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try putting up anything that reduces a residential property’s natural light by more than 15%, you’ll learn quickly

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Sound's like your speaking from experiance

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reasonable restrictions. I guess it has saved a lot of old buildings from the mindless renovations and high rises.

6 years ago | Likes 347 Dislikes 9

Also, caused a lot of urban sprawl, increased housing prices, increased commute times, increased carbon emissions, & reduced others' rights.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

The downside is it also increases rent by constraining housing supply.

6 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 6

Housing pricing is tricky, it is my understanding that it's somewhat special commodity in regards to simple 'price-demand' equations

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's just Tory party policy

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

Ah yes, a common example of the mindless drone, moronicus moron, who'll post whatever rubbish it reads about, without any facts at all.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

In many cities worldwide rent is increasing dramatically, and the common cause is people are moving there & they can't build enough housing

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

typically due to old zoning laws. So while I'm not so familiar with UK policy specifically, restrictions on building typically increase rent

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Builders in San Francisco literally cannot get building permits.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not due to zoning laws. It's due to greed.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yes, but there also a lot of vacant or abandoned buildings in big cities. There are so many failed building projects sitting empty

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

because people who could afford it don't want to live there (not enough light, space etc) and others cannot afford it.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Mindless renovations." Explain why old, inefficient buildings get to stay while we are practically forced to upgrade to new cars?

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 12

A lot of old buildings were demolished in favor of new, modern homes. Guess where the people who could afford these new homes ...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

...prefer to live today? In old, historic buildings with character.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't think so. Character is nice and all, but usually character means that it's shit.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Old buildings use so much fuel, it's ridiculous. We can build zero emission homes today. Those old things have to go.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 7

Most "old buildings" have survived for about 200 years. Modern houses have a life expectancy of ~25 years - that's less than the mortgage!

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

That is not true. At all. We build houses to last a century before it get's too costly to renovate them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You've fucked up your facts there, man. New construction can last indefinitely with minimal scheduled maintenance.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I must be missing all the buildings made in the 80s and 90s literally falling down dead.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh, there are ones around here that have had to have buttresses added to the outside to stop the walls literally peeling off. (1/2)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Where did you come up with the 25yr figure? That's wildly inaccurate.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Many modern materials either have a shorter lifespan than treated wood/bricks, or use epoxy adhesives with the same issue. Ask the industry.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I don't know where you live but many old cities have beauty, history and identity, not just places to put bedrooms. Modernize but preserve.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

That's fair, but at some point enough is enough and we need to move on from the past. Cities need modernization to keep up with growing

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Spoken like Le Corbusier

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

/2 world population. Important, significant buildings have every right to be preserved. But not every building that's stood for a while.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"it uses too much fuel and destroys the world" "yeah but it's pretty"

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You're also completely ignoring that many of them can be made more efficient or at least switched to renewables.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I get the sense that we have way bigger fish to fry before tearing down historic buildings becomes more practical than symbolic.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because of history, aesthetics, culture, architecture, I mean are those not enough reasons?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Nah, buttnutter96. ;-)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When my grandmother was little in the 20's the government actually taxed people for having windows in their home. 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

UK abolished the tax in 1851

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like i said. Im unsure of the specifics. I just know i saw old pictures of it. May of been a building that hasnt removed them yet.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People actually boarded up windows on their homes to prevent taxation. Not entirely sure the idea of the tax though 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0