Why not both?

Dec 13, 2022 2:18 AM

prakashcs1

Views

135277

Likes

2147

Dislikes

99

funny

space

global_warming

mars

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Plant some billionaires.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wish wish wish it was this simple. It's really about battling power structures bent on profit, not on helping our planets ecosystems

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Planting trees is nice, but trees literally will plant themselves. Clean up the oceans first.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Desertification is likely a bigger problem then you think.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Musk and Bezos would probably try planting palms in the tundra. Tax them both and get someone with a brain to solve problems.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not both? Because we are not mature enough as a species to colonize other worlds.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Neil deGrasse Tyson said that we could fix earth for a fraction of the cost of terraforming Mars.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What the FUCK is with the luddite crap?! You want to plant trees? Go for it - SpaceX, BlueOrigin, and NASA ARE NOT FUCKING STOPPING YOU!

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

*plant forests. A lot of the places that plant trees, do it for lumber, and don't plant indigenous species. Some end up hurting ecosystems

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok, but trees first. Indigenous trees tho.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Quiet! We are TRYING to get all the rich to go to Mars! Then we refuse them re-admittance to Earth. Stick to the plan!

2 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 14

If the rich go to Mars, they will take Earth's resources with them.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How about we let them back in, but the burn op on re-entry?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Can we put them on the C Ark?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I heard the Earth's are about to eaten by a giant mutant space goat.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Time to get out of the bath?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can think of faster ways to deal with the problem of the rich...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Native grasslands are also in need of severe help! Save the habitats, not just the trees

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Or YOU could donate to an organization that plants trees instead of waiting for billionaires to do the right thing.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Ay lmao, just go out and plant a damn tree, it's not exactly rocket surgey. Just look up what will work in your climate.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yes, because the average person has the purchasing power to donate to an organization which will plant enough trees to make a difference.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Simply get the change out of your couch and plant trees! It's so easy! Global warming is solved, thanks @Revokingthesealofquality!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Make fun if you want, but planting trees is pretty inexpensive. You genuinely could make a difference without being rich.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Could you literally end global warming with the change in your couch? No.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I haven't bought actual groceries since september or october. I wish I had spare money to plant trees :(

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Planting trees is inexpensive, owning the land and arranging to have the trees watered and looked after is not.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes. We should plant more trees. We should also stop cutting down most trees. And drive less. Fly less. Eat less meat. Farm better. etc

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lmao, space tech is useful for stuffs on earth too. And yeah plenty trees gonna help us when another asteroid comes our way

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're right. We should just nuke the Earth to spite the asteroid.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

IDK, I'm a fan of sending Elon to Mars... @BotDrawA Elon Musk, on mars, in a clown outfit with face paint

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

@RummageSaleBubbler Here's your (experimental extra) drawing of a "Elon Musk, on mars, in a clown outfit

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

@RummageSaleBubbler Here's your drawing of a "Elon Musk, on mars, in a clown outfit with face paint"

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

@BotDrawA Elon Musk, eating fish guts

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@ComcastLover Here's your (experimental extra) drawing of a "Elon Musk, eating fish guts in the style of

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

@ComcastLover Here's your drawing of a "Elon Musk, eating fish guts"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We could use more though. https://massinitiative.org/are-there-more-trees-in-north-america-now-than-100-years-ago/

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The number of trees is not the matter. The quality and complexity of the forests are the problem! Primary forests were/are cut down and >

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tree plantations erected.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"why not both" not works for capitalism , where ultimate value is money , climate will alweys be on 5 or 10 spot , your life is around there

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

between 5-10 , your life around 5 , what covid19 proven beyond doupt that life , well being , comfort , everything is less important then >

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

profit in capitalism , they even threw entire economy under the bus so profit could go on for few more extra weeks , not to say milions dead

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Terraform Earth!

2 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 1

Or maybe, like, STOP destroying it? Let it terraform itself back?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That’s what I keep saying. He supposedly has a plant to terraform mars but he’s incapable of solving our climate change problems?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We’re already at it! Maybe not with the results you want, but we’re making good progress

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That's what happens when you develop directly in production

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why leave a better planet for our children when we can leave our children for a better planet?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

mars cannot support trees yet. too cold and no water

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Duh, a space ladder will never reach Mars, no matter how many trees you use

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We will make a space ladder out of 2x4's

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because it would be orders of magnitude easier to build colonies in Antarctica than on Mars. MANY orders of magnitude easier.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

both both both!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It's too late to "just plant trees", anyone who tell you they plant trees are just doing greenwashing.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Trees plant themselves. What we need to do is stop doing the things that's preventing them from growing back.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on where you are, I can tell you for the west USA,we need to be burning and thinning more to reach a more historic biomass density

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can see both sides to this. I would love for there to be space travel and also taking care of the planet that we currently live on

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

More time to get off the planet if we stop killing it off.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Big facts

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what if I told you the technology needed to go to mars is the same kind of tech we need to save the earth?

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

That's funny, it seems like Earth has been trekking along for millennia without Mars tech just fine...

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

*Save ourselves. Living under a dome on Earth because we fucked up the atmosphere, oceans, and land isn't saving Mother Nature.=>

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's just sleeping with her dead corpse.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

AT least it'll be a warm dead corpse.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On Earth we have a head start. Like no tech required. Just STOP fucking shit up.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just planting trees won't solve the problem. It's much bigger and will require the world to rethink and retool how we do things.

2 years ago | Likes 714 Dislikes 14

Ok yeah, but I'll take planting trees over space hobbies

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With the way the industry is running and developing now, I don't think we have enough space to plant that many trees.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What “things” we do will stop a fucking asteroid hitting the planet?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nestle will have to be utterly destroyed for one thing

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you live in a society where billionaires _want_ to plant trees, the mindset will right the ship.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So electric and diesel powered super trees?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stop logging old growth forests, limit it exclusively to plantations. Also stop clearing land for plantations.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In fact, planting trees is often done incorrectly and causes harm. People don't plant native species and they often plant trees in grassland

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd rather go go Mars

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is ok though, people are really good at making changes for the better. Right?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Obviously

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Growing things like seaweed is also far more effective.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indeed:. https://youtu.be/tj_kOcOUr_g

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fingers crossed that fusion will give us a big boost in the process

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but in 10 years we'll have some lumber!

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Hey, wood is one of the most renewable resources we have. I mean that in all seriousness too.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Walkable neighbourhoods. Sustainable farming. An economy not measured in growth of GDP. All these and more are needed. Trees are good too.

2 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

Don't forget rewriting the rules of the free market so that its capable of preserving rather than just exploiting its participants.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

online somewhere -even reddit- let's organize / compare / discuss / revise .. plans for - "I00 acres, 200, 500, Ik, 2k.. "

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fine, I will stop planting trees.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need to curtail the population. That's the answer no body wants to admit. Society doesn't need to grow for people to enjoy life.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it was the most complex instruction elon could follow

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes. BUT planting a buttload of trees in every possible space we can (IE rooftops, between roads, etc) would be a HUGE step in the job!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it would also be (comparatively) quite cheap compared to some of the other necessary 'fixes' needed. Don't discount it so quickly!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

added to note, that adding trees, if only along roads and if only so the treetops provide 40-ish% cover, would drastically reduce the temp

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in the neighborhoods they are planted. Which reduces energy use for air conditioning, less water required for lawns, etc.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but we acns till plant trees

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was looking at just an ethernet connector and was studying its complexity, sturdiness, transparency, and ability to crimp it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We aren't getting this from any other material. We need to redesign it with sustainable materials... But.. what? Even the insulation for the

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Twisted wires and cable sleeve are plastic. It's everywhere. What are gonna use? Wax paper? How can the design change for other materials?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one is gonna retool that. There's no money in it, and no one will want it. Span that over larger industries. We ah fuct. Fuct!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we use shithead/corrupt/evil billionaires, influencers, and politicians as compost for the trees, would that help?

2 years ago | Likes 164 Dislikes 8

if they use the corruption money for planting more trees, yes

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One way to find out

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’d feel better.

2 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

A bit, but my tummy is still upset.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A little Torgo's Executive Powder?

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It soothes the itch.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only if we follow up and dismantle the destructive systems that they abused to get to their position. If they just get replaced no good

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Probably.

2 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Cool! I’ve never seen the original, thanks!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah if we ever get off our asses in the first place to use em... everyone likes to say it but when is the time to do it?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bet that $44 billion could have planted what 3 trees at least?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Certainly. Just google what fraction of the global CO2 emissions is caused by the 1%...

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

1/ They are not personally using all the products from those emissions. Obviously they are in the decision making roles and need to be more

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ responsible and do more. However if you think shutting down shell for example will lead to any reduction in oil production or emissions

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/ you are naive. Someone will fill the demand. Need to change how things are done.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nop, because the ppl replacing the spot will just become the new shitheads/evil billionaire.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Feb 15, 2023 3:06 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

yeha but planting ocean algaes a bti harder on land

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone who has ever owned an aquarium will disagree with you.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeha but thats in water

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is there a way to clean ocean pollution and revitalize algae colonies?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there prob is but humans are just gonna keep trashing it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not really, there's no place to put all the plastic on land and burning it just results in more pollution and the spread of microplastics

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best case scenario plastic eating bacteria evolve naturally but even then we'd still have to deal with all the extra CO2.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ship itinto space that can be future problems

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about abandoned mines that never get cleaned up? We have so many fucking mines.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about burying plastic? It came from the ground, put it back? Or scale just too large?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends where you plant them, get some protected species and start bloking people like Musk in their homes with them.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need giant lasers to melt the surface of Mars and release all the oxygen from the ground. Kurtzgesagt did a video on it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And what then? What do you do with oxygen on a planet without a magnetic field and too low gravitation?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lets ball up all our organic waste in low earth orbit then start propelling chunks of it to Mars. all that Carbon and Nitrogen? jackpot.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fleets of martian robots start processing all that shit into emissions - start greenhousing that bitch.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But also....plant trees.

2 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

Problem is that some do just that, and then continue to do more environmental harm.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or, hear me out, don't cut them down in the first place

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Too late for that, need to halt desertification in several places, Trees do this.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wetlands restoration is often much, much more important for carbon storage. Trees are nice, but if you just plant a bunch with little 1/

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Plant trees is short hand for environmental restoration.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Regard to habitat impact, you just end up fueling future forest fires. Marshes, bogs, and wetlands can actually turn biomatter into peat 1/

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And store it over long time scales (that's how coal got made to begin with).

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a biologist from a very forrested country (Sweden): tree monocultures are NOT good for biodiversity. They may be temporary coal sinks 1/2

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

But they are death traps for insects, vascular plants, mosses and lichens. Nothing sadder then walking through a young spruce plantation...

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I figured it was like a crop, basically corn that just takes 25 years to mature. Also I've been noticing lots of Scandinavian lumber in

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

lumber yards lately, kinda crazy it's cheaper to ship it all the ways from you since Canadians are still slacking.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

60-120 years for spruce here, but yeah, basically. And very few other organisms thrive there.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, Swedes playing the long game. How big is a 120 year old spruce?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0