
IAlwaysUpvoteLowBudgetCreativeWork
1348
35
2

I don't know much about AI simply because I'm not trying to educate myself about it. My bad. I knew there was nothing Artificial or Intelligent about it. It can only reproduce what it was trained to do with phenomenal data processing capacities.
But today I stumbled on a press article about Sweathshops used by the AI Giants to train their engines. Then I found many others. This as real is as it is shocking.
Here's what the Washington Post wrote about it:
"More than 2 million people in the Philippines perform this type of crowdwork, according to informal government estimates, as part of AIβs vast underbelly. While AI is often thought of as human-free machine learning, the technology actually relies on the labor-intensive efforts of a workforce spread across much of the Global South and often subject to exploitation."
Full article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/28/scale-ai-remotasks-philippines-artificial-intelligence/
crapybarra
Shit.
atvcrash
Damn didn't know sweatshops used microwaves as monitors.
64664893
You can exploit them too: Amazon Mechanical Turk https://www.mturk.com
djhash
Whoever thought AI was human-free machine learning doesnβt know much about AI.
IAlwaysUpvoteLowBudgetCreativeWork
Kind of my point. This post was not to inform you and the other bright and AI educated folks. But I hope you are right. ie dumbasses like me who didn't know better just represent an insignificant minority. I'd like to think that If the press is still writing about it, it means awareness still need to be raised.
an0therthr0waway
photo not related, @op? these gents are using public-access computers. Note the coin slots next to the screens.
IAlwaysUpvoteLowBudgetCreativeWork
Crowdwork can be done on any computers. You just have to be registered. The picture is from another arcticle about AI eploitation of cheap labors. FYI here how it works https://crowdsourcing-class.org/assignment1.html
electronicbovine
Humans are similarly impressive, often doing what they're taught or conditioned to do
IAlwaysUpvoteLowBudgetCreativeWork
This post is only about ππ±π©π₯π¨π’ππππ’π¨π§ of people for the sake of AI training.
Timiny
I am not sure we are heading in the right direction as a people.
IAlwaysUpvoteLowBudgetCreativeWork
My minuscule contribution this morning is sharing awareness. And it is already getting downvoted so... To your point, nobody cares (or to few).
Erdanya
Yup. All of this 'AI' is basically systems drawing from their absolutely massive database(s) of images, text, sounds, etc. and mixing and matching until their answers make sense to us. They're not 'aware' in any way, they just compare the most favorable answers to questions previously asked. This, of course, means that they need to be fed this information, and the only way to do this on a large scale is to put humans to work.
CognosNerd
I like to describe it as applied machine learning. Generative AI is determinative in that if you had access to all the training data and the weights and random numbers, you could replicate the output. The model itself can take a long time to train, distributing the work to provide clean (or cleanish) data makes perfect sense to me.
[deleted]
[deleted]
CognosNerd
At no point did I say or imply that, nor did I condone this type of labor. From a technical perspective the need is there, but from a human rights perspective better controls need to be in place.