Yeah, no thanks...

Nov 28, 2018 11:20 PM

ARussianAndHisBike

Views

95400

Likes

2518

Dislikes

52

memes

adblock

pikachu

website

user

ublock origin's "block element" feature often gets me past this nonsense.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They probably aren't terribly upset that you left. You weren't contributing to their revenue anyways. They might be glad for the bandwidth.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Truth!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"please disable adblocker" *disables adblocker and reloads page* "Please disable adblocker" Are you fucking kidding me????

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I once had a site ask me to uninstall adblocker to continue using it. I blacklisted the entire domain and haven't missed one thing.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't need an adblocker if your ads weren't malicious.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And these notifications about this or that that hide the whole content, do they expect us to read them?

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I’s never the ones with a reasonable amount of adds either

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/ found a little browser adon called reader view....doesn't work on all sites but on most of them...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

gets you past a lot of pay walls and almost all with that annoying disable blocker msg...miss the mid 90's free for all internet /2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tip for websites: If you let me browse with adblock but make a point to ask nicely to be whitelisted without forcing me; I'll whitelist.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I like adds just not intrusive one

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Playback on Other Websites has Been Disabled by the Video Owner. Watch on YouTube" Never mind, I'm not so interested after all.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Double upvote plus

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can also just disable your JavaScript to view their websites...ad free :D

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I recently discovered using Reader View on iPhone will often bypass it.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm with y'all on the "ads pay for the site" thing. But I don't have adblocker. I have Firefox's block trackers and dangerous content on.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I can’t skip the ads, I skip the product.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It is insane that you even refer to it as a product and then speak as if you think they want you to have it for free.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I was referring to actual physical products or otherwise tangible goods. Like if I can’t skip a YouTube ad, whatever the ad was, not buying.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What did you think I was referring to? Websites themselves?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I think a publication is excellent, I will pay a subscription just to support them. Never, ever to remove ads. That loses a customer.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not enough people pay for subscriptions, or enter their emails for anything. it opens you up to eternal spamnation.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One corollary of this is all my subscriptions are print, none are 'ad free viewing' subscriptions.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your website is simply not that important to me, bye.

6 years ago | Likes 583 Dislikes 4

Bye.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Our freeloading asses aren't important to them either.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 14

that's where you're wrong, kiddo

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

Why?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Was looking for finger guns but this came b up so here...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Maybe, depends on whether they already bought our info or need to steal it themselves.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How so? This isn't television, where raw viewing numbers matter. YouTube, for example, tracks retention and whether an ad loads.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

TL;DR - If you aren't paying for a product, then you are the product.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is only so much data to be mined, and attention is another resource. Besides, it seems wrong to encourage the former method.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

? They weren't going to make money on you anyway, they won't miss you when you're gone.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Grease monkey is a hell of a tool.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol upvote

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I use adblock to block adblock popups.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of my favorite free anime sites became like this. Started with no ads and no pop ups when you click. Now has tons of porn ads and blocks

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

you if you have an adblocker installed for X amount of time. Stopped visiting as soon as it got that bad

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Kissanime ?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Right on the nose yeah

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

turns out that most websites aren't interested in just giving content away, apparently the DBAs and engineers want to get paid.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 11

No on trusts ads because of all the Malware and intrusive ads. If you cant get use adblock whitelisted ads, maybe you dont deserve money.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. No one should look at the web without adblock.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Madness

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

its like that simpsons episode where Comic Book Guy is like "I watch your show every night, so really you owe me."

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then they should invest their time and money in making ads that aren't 500 times the size of the content that hijack your browser and send/

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

i agree, the ad industry IS fundamentally broken.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you to malware sites. adblocks whitelist for unobtrusive advertising was a good compromise imo

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Paying with one's wallet used to mean forgoing the services of a business that didn't meet your standards.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes they should and if they don't you should not use the site. I think you are misunderstanding the argument. The point is not that 1/?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You should not use adblock, it's that if you use adblock theres no reason for them to care if you leave. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I dont mind Ads... but when the vast majority of them contain malware or just ruin the experience, no ty. --1

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm not saying ads are good or that you should tolerate them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

slap an image on the side-of-the-page like they did in the old-days (like a newspaper)... DONT force ppl to watch a video before proceeding.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's not the point. You are free to use ad block. Just dont act like websites give a shit if you leave while using it.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

i wouldn't use adblock if it wasn't for the malware that most-ads contain. Seriously, a Friend mentioned malware and THAT was my breakingPt.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And that is totally fair.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no one should be using a web browser without adblock.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

User who doesn't contribute revenue: *leaves*, Company: *doesn't care*, User:

6 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 22

Increased traffic can also mean increased shares on social media, increasing outreach, increasing revenue. So they must care a little.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, it's one thing having an advert on the side or bottom - but an obtrusive video that blasts full-volume when I'm quietly reading? Na.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

website who has no users due to shitty ads driving them elsewhere

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 8

The point is allowing adblock wont change that outcome. Either way they make no money.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Users when they realize that website is making the exactly same revenue, but saving on hosting costs:

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

drive enough users away and your hosting costs go like *way* down

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Yes. And your income does not go down because they were using adblock anyway. So again they should not care.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

now think just one step further. When they drive *all* the users away what happens?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If an adblock detector drives all their users away, then they weren't making any money to begin with.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's not the adblock detector that drives the users away is it. It's the ads that prompt the users to use adblock.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

omg finally a sensible comment that understands websites aren't free

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Fuckem

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd agree, but I want to see the website first to see if it is worth whitelisting.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's fair :)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i haven't received a bill from imgur nor youtube.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No but they have ads, which pay for you to use the site. Basically you are paying with your time watching ads.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i have adblock. they aren't getting anything from me.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Adblock or no adblock they still get paid to feature ads on their site. Whether you see them or not.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These posts really bother me. Look if you are not generating income for the site then they don't give a fuck if you use it. If anything 1/?

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

They would probably prefer you leave so you dont use up their bandwidth without giving anything. 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

"oh no! my bandwidth bills have gone down slightly! What ever shall I do!" - the very distraught CEO

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

For big websites sure. But for small websites like webcomics or for startup businesses it matters.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is exactly "I won't pay you in cash but you can do this for me for exposure".

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

this is a very 1998 attitude towards revenue.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

How do you mean?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/ I mean just gaining eyeballs with no plan to make money off them is maybe not a great idea.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ You can't lose money on each customer and make up for it in customer volume.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3/ And saying "once we have the eyeballs we'll serve them ads" is really not that great of a plan, as shown by [waves hand at ad industry]

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and many of those webcomics have patreon.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure, but that's not all that effective for a webcomic that is just starting out and does not have the fanbase needed for patreon.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

they'd host the images here and hot link them. probably would use medium website until they get enough sponsors.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, a reader base is worth money in more ways than just ads.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That’s why websites do those slideshow articles where you have to hit next page. Multiple clicks of revenue for 1 person reading 1 article.

6 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 2

'tis true

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's cool. We just need an extension to load the slides for us all at once. I had a python script do something like that once

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I remember having this insane leg cramp and getting one of those slideshows when asking what food helps leg cramps.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Did you eventually get to a slide showing a banana?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't have one so it didn't help that was the first image. I forgot what I ate but I remember the extreme pain and frustration.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bar of soap in bed and bathing in epsom salt did helped for me. But I already ate bananas normally.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"clicks of revenue" < interesting concept. Please explain.

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

If you split an article into 10 pages, that's 10 ads you can show them and claim revenue for instead of just 1.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Ten times* we all know those greasy ducks cram as many as as they can. 100 words of article and 20 adds per page

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

What happens when every site does this or asks for a subscription.

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

Usenet.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is subscription based.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then it opens place for competition that doesn't do that and makes up for it by larger user base and additional or other monetization method

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What other methods of monetization could be implemented?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then there will be more things like mastadon, sites hosted by the users as it should have been.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make new websites. Many free open source programs exist because of the same phenomenon, because some tech people rely on is paywalled.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Comparing the free versions to most paid versions reveals how garbage they are. Open/libre office is trash compared to MsOffice.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you want free or 'good'? Nobody who is good will do it for free, and people doing it for free can't afford to make it good. That's life.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gotta throw out the whole internet.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Advertisements don't have to be awful and predatory. Ad networks could police themselves for malvertisement. There are many things 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

that should have been done before we got to this point let alone that point. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There are anti-antiadblockers.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You get your content somewhere else, there are always sites that repost stories for views.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The great thing is that it'll never happen.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'll white-list like 6 of them which I use regularly, and the others can go fuck themselves.

6 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

I bet over time this list will grow.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The internet ad bubble bursts.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What does that mean?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disable your ads to disable my adblock

6 years ago | Likes 392 Dislikes 3

I first read that as you saying adblock twice, so the first thing that came to mind was "no u"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ads are fine. So long as they don’t make noise, move my screen, or have those fucking fake buttons.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I don’t mind certain types of adds. Pop up adds are the ones where I lose my shit.

6 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

And those redirection ads that try to pretend to be an antivirus. “Your computer is at risk! Click here to fix it” fuck off.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly a few shit sites cost so many others revenue because the majority of people aren't going to whitelist decent sites after installing

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cc: @imgur

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did my time enduring pop-ups and drive-by virus delivery ads. Now everything gets uBlocked.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You should disable ad blockers on sites you frequent and trust with ads. It's what keeps them in business if you don't subscribe.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Prove it

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

...what? Do you think websites magically generate income from air?

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I had some sites I trusted with adverts. They were less than willing to make the effort to keep that trust when it came to pay day. Blocked.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I used to do that until recently, when nasty malware for Linux became more common this year. Now I don't trust any of them.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

as a desktop linux user running mozilla (seamonkey, like firefox), I'm interested in reading about this malware. Got links?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Source on rise of Malware for Linux?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's always a risk. But so is the shutting down due to lack of ad money. Its part of why I have Malwarebytes do a scan every day.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

This comment brought to you by Malwarebytes.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Perhaps if everyone starves them of money because of malware danger, the ad networks will verify the safety of ads they run for once.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0