Zero-Zero Ejection From F-35B Today In Texas (Language Warning)

Dec 15, 2022 10:07 PM

tomatoboy

Views

1536983

Likes

1130

Dislikes

14

Source: https://twitter.com/houstonairw/status/1603469769407139842?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1603469769407139842%7Ctwgr%5E959442303182fee9fdd4d8a7223da40073824d61%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.usni.org%2F2022%2F12%2F15%2Ff-35b-joint-strike-fighter-crashes-in-texas

news

science_and_tech

f35

ejection

texas

v

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Was a little worried that the jet was going to make a break for it and go towards the road

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Expensive Whoopsie!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That ejection almost brought him right back to the plane, good thing it wasn't on fire!

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Was thinking it'd be bad for the wind to pick up and pull the pilot back towards the plane.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or into the bloody intake! That's what was going through my mind! I wonder if the engine auto stops if the pilot ejects.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol the parachute looks like a boobie

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Nice. He'll get a tie from Martin-Baker.

2 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

Translation to civilian?

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Martin-Baker is the manufacturer of ejection seats. They send gifts to pilots saved by their seats (although I thought it's champagne)

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Poor guy saved his butt, only to have it thoroughly chewed by the squadron commander.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think the F-35B has an auto eject mode. He may not have initiated the eject.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

That.. is great, but terrifying at the same time

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It seemed like the landing was going OK, but then things got harrier.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The commentary sums up Texas as a whole.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What's important here is the pilot is safe.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's coming out of your check

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's coming out of all of our checks

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

VTOL - Very Trashed On Landing

2 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 1

VBWOTM. VeryBigWasteOfTaxpayerMoney: description of the F35 program.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This comment isn't appreciated nearly enough.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That'll probably buff right out.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

With a $50,000,000 buffer.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I came here to say this

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think he still landed in the explosion zone.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They might learn some things from the accident to tweak the ejection seat behavior.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why we don't have healthcare

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could have gone worse... Could have gone better.

2 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 3

Coulda been raining.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, could have been a F-104 Starfighter...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those planes were flying coffins.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But really cool as well!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, no doubting that. They looked cool as hell.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Comrade Dyatlov's school of thought. Not great but not terrible.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pucker factor must have been through the roof before pulling the ejector handles.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Whenever an F-35 crashes, there's always a flood of comments, always the same, talking about how bad it is, as if the F-35 is alone in fault

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

DOT&E say it's a piece of shit. The Air Force wants its replacement as soon as possible. So does the Navy.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

The F-35B is the best VTOL jet in the world. Not that there's any others to compare it to since they stopped making Harriers.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just want the F16 to be phased out by 6th generation aircraft already

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. It must become chonkier.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

RT and Pierre Sprey did an amazing job of convincing folks the F35 was garbage. It's rather amazing how well memes work as propaganda.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

That they did. The F-35 isn't flawless, but a bit of aviation history and you know it's not the worst.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The F35 program is an unnecessary waste of taxpayer money. It will NEVER achieve any of the claimed cost savings.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ejection seat works great though, props to camera man

2 years ago | Likes 214 Dislikes 1

Don't give him a prop I think he does just fine with a real camera.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also, we're clearly seeing a turbojet.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

From a total lay persons point of view it seems like the distance the ejection seat sent him would have been insufficient if the plane ?no?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you wanna be upwind of an explosion

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay. Now do you want to comment on what I said instead of that rando piece of advice?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I might break international laws if I provided insight

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’re soooo cool!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An important thing to note is ejection seats put incredible stress on the pilots body quite often resulting in serious spinal fractures->

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Increasing launch velocity to obtain furthrer distance could be disastrous. In the air it could get a lot more distance.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. They also could fall into a ball of flame.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And like, stop being alive.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The what I thought. He's gonna get sucked into the engine

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whole episode looks like a scene from a video game where the physics fails and the models rigidbody goes wonky

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

The Kraken and Clang really do exist!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing." -Chuck Yeager

2 years ago | Likes 534 Dislikes 2

I’m no aeronautical engineer, buuuut technically he did not, erm….walk… away from that landing.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a former fully qualified AF avionics tech. That aircraft will also NOT be flying the next day. or the next. or the next...

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah, he also did what.... like 7-10 million USD in damage you think?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The F-35 is a MASSIVE BOONDOGGLE. What a waste. I'd rather spend the money on healthcare.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Doubly so if you're test piloting unproven technology like Chuck.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Chuck Yeager is the reason why pilots talk the way they do on coms

2 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

Sometimes I just shake me head. There was a kc135 callsign “Ruff” the other day, he would bark when he called tower

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ad a non pilot,I will absolutely sound like the jet pack guys from red alert 2, if I ever fly.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Oh, dis is nice coat. ACKnowledged

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Rubber shoes in motion!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It will be a silent... spring...

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Rid'en Hiiigh

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I am contractually obligated to upvote this comment.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That seemed a little excessive... but hey, the pilot is worth more than the.. *checks airframe cost*.. ohhh....

2 years ago | Likes 333 Dislikes 5

$400,000* btw

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s cheaper than a new boeing 767.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no way to know if that plane isnt going to explode if youre inside, im sure it was based on the increasing warnings blaring

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe he felt a bit too tall

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Lolhe did everything he could to regain control of the aircraft. Once he determined he totally lost the aircraft training kicks in to eject

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Better to 0-0 eject and have a bumpy ride then potentially burn to death.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The cost of training a pilot is about 10Mil. That plane is 35Mil. Mind you, that plane does not gather experience. The pilot does.

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

and that's for a "standard" USAF combat pilot IIRC very very few can qualify on that plane so the plane might be cheaper. also

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

can pop a new plane out in a few months, pilot will take ~25 years

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup. In WWII RAF was not running out of planes. Heck, the Doolittle raid plan was to ditch the aircraft. Only one of 16 B25s landed.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

$101.3 million according to breakingdefense.com.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Total cost of ownership vs item purchase price

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Nobody would have been surprised if that thing exploded and/or burst into flames.

2 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 0

Pilot definitely made the right call. It went wrong and they tried to recover. Put it in as safe a position as they could and then looked/

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

After themselves. Couldn't have done anything else at that point but put themselves in danger.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The time and training of a pilot shouldn't be overlooked. Honestly not sure of the comparison but people should be worth more. I hope. :}

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

But isn't it super traumatic on the pilot? I read somewhere that they can only have 1 or 2 ejections for medical purposes.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Time and training of pilot is worth much more. MUCH more.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Can’t put a price tag in experience

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Replacement cost of an experienced pilot is about $10m, replacement cost of the plane is about $35m.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

real low speed crashes like this can be repairable, idk if this one is or not

2 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 1

This is, but its still a lot of work and not cheap.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Most likely repairable.

2 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

I doubt it will be. It was undergoing QA tests and hadn't be transferred to the government yet. It'll be disassembled and they'll have to

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

figure out what went wrong.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's going back to depot and may be at least a year before it's back in the fight.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

i could understand a month or two, but a full year?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're going to have to go over the entirety of the airframe for microfractures and other issues, they'll make sure it's 100% good.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know a guy can have it in the air next week if you're not picky and don't ask questions

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

A human life is always worth more than the vehicle. I'm not dying to save Uncle Sam money on an already bloated defense budget...

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

You are absolutely right. However, the US govt. doesn't share your sentiment.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yeah they don't care about what it's worth, they care about what it would cost to replace.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And some cant be bought one by one. The f35 had to bought by 5 or 6 at once in the 90's

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Failure of forward lift fan.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ohhh chute!!!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude…. everything after the question mark is irrelevant: https://twitter.com/houstonairw/status/1603469769407139842?

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Also, nitter.net or another instance.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Heh. I had the opposite reaction; I don't need to go to twitter, but would like to read the source article that OP started with: ref_url=

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The question mark itself is unnecessary as well.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but that's a good dividing line that people can recognize

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I was always told that a pilot only gets 2 lifetime ejections before they hafta retire. It compresses ur spine permanently by a half inch.

2 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

There's also a rumor conscripts can't shoot more than 3 APILAS in a lifetime, because of microfractures to the skeleton. 3rd shot kills ya.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I hope they're still tall enough to ride the Tilt-a-Whirl. Losing that on top of everything else would be devastating.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's bullshit - Danny Devito is up to 28 and still going.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That might be a polite way of saying "Hey, you crashed or got shotdown twice, so we don't trust you with a plane anymore."

2 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

“You’re too short to be a pilot… now.”

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Does that explain Tom Cruise?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

How many times did he eject? Six or seven?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have to give up flying, but they don’t have to retire. (Source: retired fighter pilot father, whose takeoffs equaled his landings.)

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

The man you should really fear is the guy with more landings than takeoffs.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey the pilot in the vid has equal take offs to landings. He just had a little flourish at the end of the landing

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your call sign was Sable I take it? How'd you end up with it?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It’s strictly my Imgur “call sign.” Dad & bro were the pilots. I’m a teacher. ?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s a helluva stat at the end there.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It really depends and some pilots have ejected more than twice. There was an A-7 pilot who did three in a few years.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

makes sense. I'm sure its dictated by the individual. Worked on F/A-18s myself. Never asked an actual pilot, just heard it from other techs.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The model of ejection seat, the circumstances of the ejection, the landing under chute, and the pilot’s anatomy all play a role.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

So being a non plane fan, was this a vtol landing that got messed up or some trick with the eyes?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Absolutely a VTOL landing that got messed up.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you know that pilot’s name? I ask because he might’ve known my father, who flew them, too.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly, no. I know it was an A-7E, the story was relayed by a David Tussey, and one happened on the Lexington. Two were during quals and…

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

…one was during operations in the Arabian Sea.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, a Navy A-7. My father was Air Force, so he probably didn’t know him.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, and I suspect that played a role. I’m betting the USAF would pull a pilot who lost two planes. The Navy and Marines are a tad more…

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow cool, we just saw the destruction of ... The entire state's education budget...

2 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 6

Nah, a f35 is like $400m tops and even a stupid state like AL spends a few billion on education. It's at least a few schools though.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nah, little flames, no explosion, most of the rather expensive electronics can be salvaged. The airframe is a loss tho.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

To be fair, it's a VERY stupid state... Not that that's actually the children's fault.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And the Brass wants to replace the Holy Brrrrrrt with that POS? The only response

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 19

At least the BRRRT can do CAS. The F-35A still can't.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Look, I love the A10 as much as the next armchair pilot, but its not as good as its made out by every DCS kiddy and the reformers.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

In peer combat, that plane is skeet.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ya, brass is funny about stuff like that. They prefer their planes to shoot things instead of the other way around.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Stop glorifying this colossal mistake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBzNKS-1ztU it's engineering is insane, sure, but it is not the (1)

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

(2) Godsend that you think it is.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

And the massively overbudget, under-performing, under-production wonder blunder is of a corruption scandal is??

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You described both the A-10 and the F-35 so IDK what point your are trying to make....

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Simply that the 35 is not a godsend. The A-10 needs replacing but the I don't see the stealth banana being a cost effective replacement.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Holy BRRRRT is not as good as you think. A great deal of mythos and propaganda surrounds that plane.

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

I know you're probably joking, but the A10 is a meme and the is not a plane of the future. F-35 is light years better at everything

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Which is why they're introducing a cropduster for light attack. Those ever important light years of technological progress.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That’s a relic, would rather not go full Russia on air superiority.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Feb 7, 2025 9:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I mean, the B-52 is older, and the M2 is older still. The difference is, the A-10 was not so great when it first went into service.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I’ve cracked knuckles on those things.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't get it. Why would you eject? You're down, you cut the engines, plane's not on fire.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Because these decisions are done within a matter of seconds and hindsight isn't something a lot of pilots are willing to wait for.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't get it because you aren't the dude in the aircraft that just got thrown around like a rag doll. Your sitting on your couch.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That's easy to say when it's over and done with. If that plane burst into flames instead, it would have surprised no one. Ejecting was still

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the right course of action for the situation.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Jan 31, 2023 11:26 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

F-35B has an auto eject mode, it’s not yet clear if he ejected or if the plane ejected him.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Technically, all planes have an auto-eject mode

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Regardless, from where the pilot is seated it wouldn’t be immediately apparent if there was a fire.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And only with hindsight is it apparent the aircraft stopped moving after ejection, the pilot couldn’t know that.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0