Finding Ammonite Fossils In River Rocks

Jul 13, 2025 8:59 AM

OceansRust

Views

756733

Likes

553

Dislikes

83

#rocks #awesome #fossils #mildly_interesting

rocks

awesome

fossils

mildly_interesting

Don't chisel without eye protection.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

That seems like a very shitty way to do that in a location that should be left alone.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Praise helix! (But also, I hope they had permission and that wasn't a public park O_o)

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They could've asked a 6-year-old to dam that stream first to make it easier.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This kills the ammonite.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This kills the rock

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or you could leave the lovely rock where it is as we already know what a fucking ammonite looks like and as has already been noted how many do you smash up to find the right one.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

BS, you didn't just 'find' it. You planted it there. Millions of years ago.

3 weeks ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Those amonites are clearly paid actors!

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Bender Bending Rodriguez would like a word

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By what right do you destroy this heritage that you consider yours and it is not?

3 weeks ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

This kills the rock

3 weeks ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 5

And the fossil. No skills. There's careful extraction that takes hours and gets you a nice fossil. Then there's smashing everything and picking up the pieces. This guy has no skills and the manners of a caveman. If they did this to dinosaur bones, paleontology museums would look like a collection of mosaics.

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Was gonna post this, beat me to it 😂

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I like the ouch prevention on the end of that bar.

2 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This kills the... oh dammit!

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What kind of asshat does this in a middle of a creek

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That does not seem like the wisest way to get a fossil. Shouldn't he ask if he can take the rock to a lab or something so they can be extracted more neatly?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can we not ? Jesus people really are a disease .

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Dude fucked up a perfectly good rock is what he did.

3 weeks ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

This kills the rock

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

This kills the fossil.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck you HARD if you don't have the express permission of the entire community where that river runs, to cut up smooth stones and steal future generations' discoveries.

We all know what ammonites are and what they look like. Leave something for whatever species becomes dominant after humans are done fucking ourselves out of existence.

3 weeks ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

Y does the future generation get to discover it y not us

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are we actually getting angry over people finding fossils?

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I mean this is kind of a stupid comment, by that time they'll be able to find all of our human fossiles

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

To all the people complaining about this, fuck you. it's a fucking rock if we can't touch rocks and wood then maybe we shouldn't have been put on this giant rock with wood on it, without this shit we would still be naked in a caves I was put here to survive and I'll fucking touch a god dam rock and a tree to do it. fight a different battle

2 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This belongs in a museum!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But... how can you know there will be a fossil inside?

3 weeks ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

Smash enough rocks and you'll be right eventually, fuck all the nature you ruin in the mean time

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You usually look for spherical ones. A process called concretion occurs when sediment and minerals accumulate around a nucleus of an object. Fossils tend to do that because they observe minerals in the process.

So when at a beach, river, or freshly exposed sediment, you might start seeing some round mineral rocks that have a possible chance of being an ammonite or another thing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This one was partially exposed on the outside at the waterline. I imagine experience hunting for fossils, plus being in an area known for finding them helps a lot.

3 weeks ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 5

Oh yeah. TY.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There is one ore more also outside but under water

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oh. Ok. Thanks.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The answer is more often "we record splitting them all and some of them have cool things inside, then only post the fun ones."

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Is this actually legal? When I was young, I got in deep trouble for rerouting a very small stream.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

yeah, go wreck those fossils instead of bringing the whole rock into a lab, and leave freshly broken jagged rocks, you go, shitferbrains

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

The comment section is wild

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

if this is on public land, F*CK that guy

3 weeks ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 5

Even on private land, we should remember we own it for a few decades at most. We shouldn't devastate it for future generations.

3 weeks ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

I mean if all generations kept saying that it'll remain a rock and not a fossil. Unless you want it to remain a rock and this is not about future generations to find the fossil.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

This kills the rock.

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

An asshole ruined a watering hole in the Frio River that I had been going to for 20 years doing this shit. Fuck that person.

3 weeks ago | Likes 410 Dislikes 10

What happened ?

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

it kicks up (and creates new) sediment like nobody's business, the rough edges get blasted by the water and take a decent distance to knock out of the flow to the riverbed below.

3 weeks ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

The Frio has been fucked by fuck people. It's a crime.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was a rock formation that allowed the water to pool into a nice, natural "pool". They destroyed part of the barrier/wall that allowed it to gather and create a natural mini waterfall.

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Pardon my ignorance, but how does this mean mess it up? Wont the river smooth the edges with the sand and current?

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Not in our lifetimes....

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I think you're failing to take into consideration how happy they were to sell them as book ends to some knob who will only look at them once

3 weeks ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

I was just thinking about every nature class I ever took as a school kid and even later in university that was some variant of “leave no trace “or “take nothing but photographs.“ Then there are these bastard rock hounds and their wanton destruction just to get their little trophies.

3 weeks ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 6

Rockhounds are the worst people to meet on a trail. They're either shameless and belligerent old heads or unaware newbies who think you're kidding. I can already hear the excuses. "This is nature! I found it on the ground! It's just a rock! What, so it's illegal to pick up rocks now? If it weren't for people like me, this trail wouldn't even have visitors! This is public land! My tax dollars paid for it, so I own it! If I don't turn every monument I see into rubble my peepee won't get hard!"

3 weeks ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

Oh yea definitely assholes doing it in nature as theres a state park specifically for that in NM though picked clean. Also there plenty of non nature places you can do it, road cuts are great because they already blew up the rocks. And areas near urban areas where its already disrupted like creeks

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

See this is why I used to rock hunt on atv trails

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Fr all I was thinking about with every grating chisel puncture was “damn we just out here fucking up nature”

3 weeks ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 3

Dude. This is like being worried about your neighbors kids paper airplane's carbon footprint instead of all the commercial airline traffic in the world for a year. But I guess anything helps.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 28

Talk about a defeatist attitude

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can be worried about both, you know. You can care about trying to keep nature near you pristine *and* worry about the global effects of commercial airline traffic.

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

It's a fucking rock chill out fight a better battle or get a life I bet if I followed u around I'd find some shit people hate about u

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 23

So if I shit on your lawn, it's just shit right?

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So rocks and shit are the same thing to you

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tard

2 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How can it be legal to destroy rocks?

3 weeks ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 15

Is that a "Hard Labor" reference?

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 34

it also makes fuckloads of new sediment for a long while because all of those new sharp edges get blasted by the water and takes an extremely long time to round off so it'll stop. Downstream is going to be murky for years, if not decades, depending on how much this massive tool disturbed. It's fine on solid dry land, but it's a real dick move in a water source.

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

It's destroying nature

3 weeks ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 14

Nature already did that to the mountain - What are talking about - I hope you're not saying paleontology, archaeology, mineralogy and geology should be outlawed.

3 weeks ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 27

Are you for real?

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 24

How is it not destroying nature? People going around breaking things in nature because of their own gain...

3 weeks ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 15

Arguable from an ethical point of view, sure. From a legal point of view, though, even the oldest known legal scriptures (e.g. 1 Mose 1:28) make provisions for using nature to human benefit. In this context, nature is never an end in itself - and you'll be hard pressed to argue that splitting a rock prematurely (nature would have done that in a few hundred years) is going to create any damage for other living beings, including humans.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 19

Agreed. It doesn’t appear this gentlemen is destroying public property in the name of science. More likely to sell for profit. I have no evidence either way but it seems this is glorifying natural destruction for one’s own benefit. Whatever happened to leave no trace?

3 weeks ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

We have no idea what kind of permissions this guy has or what his purpose is. Chill.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Would that be legal to take / keep? No need for a fossicking license or something like that?

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Would be iffy in Canada. Meddling with a federal waterway is a fantastic way to eat a fine from logs and frogs.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Logs and frogs?

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Loggers and French people

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

ministry of natural resources

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0