Submersible exploring Titanic goes missing

Jun 19, 2023 4:27 PM

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65953872

Edit: link to the Livestream: https://www.youtube.com/live/F1v1Mt5YmTk?feature=share

missing

titanic

I'll be honest, it's the kind of thing I'd do if I wasn't absolutely terrified of doing it. I've been fascinated by the wreck ever since Bob Ballard's team found it. Super deep-sea exploration is inherently dangerous though, and the wreck has been steadily collapsing onto itself. Alvin landed on the deck in 86 but if someone tried that now they'd risk punching right through.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

JAAAAACK

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When the wreck was first discovered I recall there being some loud and repeated sentiment that it was to be treated with respect, with no pillaging or visiting for profit. Funny how that changes over time.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Well thanks to climate change, we know it wasn't the iceberg this time.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Little known fact: Once icebergs have a taste for blood they become maneaters. Just because it melted into the ocean doesn't mean it's gone away, only biding its time and waiting for more unsuspecting humans to sail by.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone get Statham QUICK!!!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

James Cameron: *heavy breathing*

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

He's already working on the movie.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The ocean is really out for the rich these days.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

'missing,' like they'll turn up at a beach bar in Bermuda drinking mai tais

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They were probably murmaidered

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait. A banana?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was there when I stole the gif

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

was it an orca or was the missing sub in the search party and didnt realize who they were looking for?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“…submarine suffered a sudden blunt impact before comms were lost…”

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Please tell me Elon was on board.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I don't think so but word has it he's on his way with his own sub to rescue them 🥴

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Bye

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Another tourist attraction next to the other tourist attraction.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does anyone know how much it costs? I was not aware of this as an activity. I have no monies, but interested in knowing how much these people paid.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like it costs $250,000 per ticket.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy shit.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, crazy money, but the cost helps cover the entire expedition so I guess it makes sense.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never knew there was a sight seaing tour of the Titanic. Also I would never do it because of the cost oh and the whole going supper deep underwater.

2 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

What if we offered you breakfast deep underwater instead?

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

You mean down at brunch depth?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nothing wrong with sight-seaing in the supper deep

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats what she said.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Steak and eggs?

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If its only crew onboard, I feel bad for them; it has to be horror of the worst type. If it had a full crew of rich fucks, I... well, I still only feel bad for the crew.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Well, if the pressure hull buckled at depth I think they'd never even know what hit them, like a mountain landed on them.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

250k per person. Given the tech needed to reach the bottom, that's probably a bargain. But I expect it is indeed all rich fucks.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yeah. Honestly, with the cost of the tech, you'd think that including a simple tether would, you know, be a cheap way to avoid this sort of thing from happening in the first place.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Two.and a half miles of tether strong enough to recover the sub would be absolutely massive. If it can't surface on its own, pulling up 23k pounds is no small feat at that depth. It'll require specialized recovery vessels and I bet they wouldn't be on station before the 4 days of air runs out. There are many reasons as simple as radio failure for loss of comms, but most of them are catastrophic. Loss of electrics and backups, rupture in the pressure hull...

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

eek. All horrible ways to go

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The submersible doesn't weigh 23k lbs in the water though. Even if the buoyancy control or hull ruptured, the force needed to slowly pull it to surface is much, much less than the dry weight of the vessel (and a redundant emergency flotation system seems like an obvious safety measure that would help as well). 2.5 miles of 3/8" EHS comes in at 3603 lbs and can safely exert 13,860 lbs of constant force, which would be more than enough. Not nothing but totally doable.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0