Wingardium something mimosa

Sep 17, 2020 1:50 AM

Cathunterninja

Views

93798

Likes

2940

Dislikes

151

Savage

harry_potter

jk_rowling

hogwarts

funny

sick_burn

I’m buying it, Harry Potter is bigger than Rowling and I refuse to leave Harry Potter behind. Day 1 buy for me.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

I'm in that weird age group where I don't give a fuck about Harry Potter

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

She's catching a lot of shit as of late as she's written a new book about a transvistie man killing women.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well it’s fantasy so...

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 38

Which part of the game has you shitting in the street and using magic to make it disappear?

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Oh, it doesn't disappear. Only turns invisible. For the lulz.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sweet! I identify as a lvl 69 necromancer. This game will be perfect.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I love that JK Rowling is somehow hated by MRAs and SJWs. All that tells me is she is a sane, normal person.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 22

They released some gameplay, you actually get to battle Voldemort!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great! Now make it for a console people actually have.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Last I heard its coming to current and next gen PS and Xbox.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont understand all she said was that you cant change your biology. Yeah you can switch gender but you still have a female pelvis so what?

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

it’s a fair point, no?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

its a perfectly fair point, but the certain communities dont like that answer, so they start a witchhunt.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yeah i just dont get it im all for doing what you want with your body but knowing basic biology shouldn't be a crime. Why not have both?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Who gives a shit about her beliefs? Its not important, she's brave to even give an honest opinion.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I was told Harry Potter has no author it just magically appeared one day.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

"Neville's patronus was lice" HA

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Inbefore we get harry potter mobile again. Sweet jesus was that a horrendous display.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the one that was basically a pokemon go rip off or some other one?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some other one, where you tap the screen until you're out of stamina, and either wait or buy more stamina. It was full of filler where you1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

literally sit there and spend stamina to use your imagination. Even in like, dangerous situations like with a tree crushing your throat 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you gotta spend stamina. And then if you run out even at that part you wait or pay to keep going. HD expensive visual novel more like. 3/3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was paywall after paywall as well. Stamina was hard to earn and it was always encouraged to pay premium currency to get past it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Takes place in the 1800s which according to JK is when Wizards shit on the floor and used magic to clean up

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Wait seriously?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it appeared on a bunch of “did you know” things. So the giant bathrooms were purely decorative.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Hogwarts didn't always have bathrooms. Before adopting Muggle plumbing methods in the eighteenth century" 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"witches and wizards simply relieved themselves wherever they stood, and vanished the evidence."

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We're still on about this? What did she say that was so insane it warranted this kind of ridicule?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 27

you don't think she's said enough to warrant this kind of ridicule already?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

she said people who menstrate are women

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

She's basically just a professional terf at this point, so yes, we're still "on about this". Why wouldn't we be? She's still a fucking terf.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 18

Uh well she literally JUST wrote a book about how you will be murdered if you trust a man in a dress so yeah shes pretty transphobic

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 23

This ontop of her huge transphobic essay, and retweeting transphobic stuff.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

It's bonkers you'd consider fiction transphobic.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

This is one of the dumbest thoughts I've ever seen. Kudos to you for your bravery in expressing it.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I'm simplifying my point but it still stands. If you're offended by a fictional story, stick to colouring books.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Welp this is a thing I did not know. I thought this was about the fact she was changing shit about her characters.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It's obnoxious and feeds into shitty LGBT+ 'representation', but no, the issue worth caring about is the virulent transphobia

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thats fine. Most people who dont know about her being transphobic are suprised, as she has been seen as a positive influence for lgbtq folks

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

She tried to hide it at first but its been getting worse and worse as time goes on. She still claims she isnt.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

She also wrote a book where a bald man tried to murder a baby. So yeah, she's pretty baldphobic

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well, if it was just the book, id think nothing of it other than wow thats shitty representation. But she also has essays and tons of tweets

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

about how she hates trans people, so, yeah.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I haven't found one word of hate in her twitter. All her respective twits are full of respect, correctness and empathy.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess Silence Of The Lambs was transphobic too then. Literally the same plot.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Uh yeah it kinda was. Seeing that definitely put off my transition for a few years because common media displayed it as perversion.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Worse, a perversion that only perverted serial killers have! Do you know how that fucks up someone mentally? Being told their life is a perv

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah exactly! Go watch disclosure on Netflix, they talk about the danger of this trope in detail, one woman even talked about coming out

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

to her friend as trans and their reaction was "what, like Buffalo Bill in silence of the lambs?"

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Does writing a story about a trans murderer somehow imply that all trans people are murderers? It's not a "trope", it's a fucking story.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Literally yes. Even Jonathan Demme recognized it later and was one of the reasons he made Philadelphia. "Shitty bigotted trope happened in

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

old thing, so why problem in new thing?" is a pretty bad take. Just wanted to point that out too, while I'm here.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well then we should stop giving the bad guy a foreign accent, a scar, or any defining characteristics at all. That way nobody feels offended

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, at least it is scientifically accurate by being bi-gendered. Come at me snowflakes!

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 26

Might want to choose a different name if ur gonna troll online there buddy

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Who says I'm trolling?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

We do. Lol

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well there are two well-defined sexes and several intersex variations (based on DNA possibilities). As far XX and XY being the only...

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

way your sex is determined or expressed? A complete misnomer from oversimplification.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Question: If a misnomer, how do we account for the impossibility of a YY Male? The X is literally required. Surely a binary mechanism 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're forgetting the possibility of extra or missing chromosomes

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How so? It’s still X, Y, or both. Where is the third?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the same sense that a binary 1 and a 0 can be used to create any integral digit that exists! I can count to any number using binary. //

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Funny how no one remembers Anne Rice having meltdowns on the Internet because someone made a bad review to her book. It's all marketing, ppl

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honest question. Is the internet done hating JK Rowling? Kotaku is notorious for trying to cancel people so I’m surprised they’d promote it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I like her books. She seems respectful in her discourse. If her way of voicing opinion is unacceptable, what would be?

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Apparently, tweeting about your opponent's death and how Britney wrote your opponent's books.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There isn't one. There's no appropriate way to express bigotry.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 18

Right.. but in this field, which is strife with differing opinions also on an academic basis, there has to be tolerance going both ways.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

There does not have to be tolerance of bigotry. Ever.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Who defines bigotry?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

JK has not apeared out to hurt anyone. She is respectful and mindful and has some very on point concerns from what I've read.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

And she's being given the 1-2 "Let's find any dirt we can and read it in the LEAST generous way possible, because this is obviously Satan"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Because when you lack arguments your only option is to shame and shout people down.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

"The fractured but whole" is the only game with proper gender options, change my mind.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is the HP series as good as I remember? I havent read it since I was a kid.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

If you don't get hung up on plot holes or world-building issues, then yes. Fun, intricate plot, great characters, and grows with each book.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Mostly. I've reread as an adult, most recently about 10 years ago. It's a great read with a smooth, easy to consume style. Her silliness...

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Is zant and wacky and fun. Her characters are lovable. Her gradients of good and evil are a great balance of simple/safe and complex/...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Challenging. But...really some nonsense plot holes and bad decisions to move the plot along. And of course it's hard not to connect to her..

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Recent craziness. But all in all, it's still a freaking delight.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

its an enjoyable enough series with flaws in it if you actually think about things.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love it, play the audiobooks on repeat. Don't approve of what the author has been saying lately, but the books are important to me

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

This is exactly what I do as well. Stephen Fry helps me sleep

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You have to take it at face value, and try not to think about it much, as the plot holes are large and plentiful.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not the literary masterpiece that some people like to make it out as, but it's a wonderfully fun book, even as an adult. The stronger

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Points would be that the characters feel very real and dynamic and that the setting captures the idea of magic in a childhood wonder sort of

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Way. Strong, likeable, and believable protagonists coupled with menacing, unlikeable antagonists in a world which you can't help but wish to

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Visit is a pretty winning combination for most people.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Except that was all retconned for a cash grab years later. If you consider the original 7 its great.If you consider the authors grand sum...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If someone thinks HP is a literary masterpiece, they haven't read many books.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's an easy series to fan-person over. Most people read it as a child, so it runs on an engine with nitro-nostalgia, and the strong

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Characters make it easy to feel personal - you recognize yourself, your loved ones, and your enemies in the books. As a result, people get

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Carried away and can't cast a critical eye on it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess I've just moved on.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I applaude dashirls willing ignorance to the authors beliefs. But JK herself has destroyed the series IMO. The initial 7 are good.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I consider everything beyond book 7 to be shameless pandering to communities she doesnt care about and actively exploited.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rowling wrote a great series and decided half hearted social commentary was the best way to revive it, destroying her brainchild for money.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

there's more?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Re-viewing it as an adult, I realize it's way more of a social drama than a fantasy book, the worldbuilding is veeery lacking too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The trailer looks fucking amazing https://youtu.be/rQfRGDivqVU

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I loove Harry Potter but I'm not seeing the fucking amazing part? There's zero gameplay or narrative given. Looks like any early PS4 game.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly shows no actual gameplay. Just pre rendered movies. This could be anything at this point. No gameplay, no context, no chance

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

you do not play many mmo don't you ? this is at best a 6/10

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So 5/10 better than wow lol

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

gw2 atm. sadly "new world" from amazon will be trash according to video

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Watched a lot of it on twitch, looks even more boring to play then BDO

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

actually is quite fun if u love exploration. combat system is cool too. you should try , it's free

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do you still play wow ?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quit recently, they only care about store mounts and raids

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Idk if I'm more against this because like most Harry Potter (and WB ) games it's gonna be a live service micro-transaction shitshow.

5 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 7

I mean... there have been 3 HP games since 2013, all of which were on mobile, so of course they were like that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd really be into a Hogwarts open-world, but yeah, WB. Also developped by Avalanche Software, apparently their latest release was... Cars 3

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

...That cars racing games except the first one were actually pretty great...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The studio's been closed and re-opened since then. This is their first game since they left Disney. We don't know what to expect.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind they did like a Harry Potter (go to hogwarts) phone game that was like... honestly atrocious and scummy.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Preach the words brother!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OR because Rowling is a fucking terf and it's kinda ruined Harry Potter for me, because I DON'T want to support her.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 26

Or because Harry Potter has just kinda sucked in general lately tbh like fuck it Fantastic Beasts 2 was cold garbage.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 24

Pump the brakes there kid. Those movies were many peoples childhoods. Also do agree that fantastic beats was cold rolled shit

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The first two movies were amazing, but the rest, lately, just seem like too much of a social drama with no fantasy-focus.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It was my childhood too. But then Rowling had to open her fucking mouth and kinda take a huge verbal dump all over it.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I've seen people saying they regret reading Potter etc because of her comments. That reaction all seems a bit much to me.

5 years ago | Likes 242 Dislikes 11

I will always have the books in my heart but I will never give her my money again.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2020 2:58 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's like saying Daniel Radcliffe does wonky movies to get attention.She is the owner of a literary empire, she needs no attention or cash

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She just released a new book and is getting major flak for it

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Am trans here, dislike rowling over her comments, love harry potty. Bitch you made a world with magic, ill be a woman with it if i want to.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Shit, they’re trying to get Gina Carano fired from Mandalorian because she put beep, boop, bop as her pronouns on Twitter. Smh

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't even think they were that bad.

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 15

Naw, the books were always pretty bad tbh

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 24

Look I have read many a book in my life and have only read Harry Potter as an adult. They're nice enough books.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For one, I don't think Stephen Fry wouldnt have wasted 100h recording the audiobooks for the series of he didn't think they were interesting

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

JK might be a TERF but Harry, Ron and especially Hermione all believe in trans rights

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Cancel culture.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

I dont think much of all her retconning, but that comment that everyone called racist or sexist or whatever it was I didnt think was at all.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 9

Jesus Christ. I gotta log off for a while.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Transphobic? She's pretty explicitly that. She actually just wrote a 900 page book about it.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 22

It's a single sentence about a man dressing a thick coat and wig to not get caught

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

She didn't though. Read it.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 11

P.s in all this, trans men barely get mentioned. She's clearly iffy about "men saying they're women", so her issue is she's really afraid1

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 15

Of men who want to abuse women. Because she got abused. That's it.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 16

Being "iffy" about men saying they're women is what transphobic is dude.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

I've been abused by men, but I don't deny trans people's gender. Don't excuse her blatant transphobia.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Except she made a long twitter post explaining she believes her experience as a "real" woman are important enough for her to dismiss ->

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

well to check myself, I just went and googled it and read a whole bunch of apparently horrible tweets from her, and they all seemed... fine?

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

They all seemed to literally just boil down to "its that persons choice". I honestly dont get it, unless im not reading between enough lines

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I couldnt find anything that hinted at saying "trans people suck" I was honestly so confused when the internet blew up at her for it

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

If a random person started saying “yes, Hermione could have been blue” and “wizards shake poops out their trouser legs” would it change 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Your experience of the books? Well, similarly, JKR cannot change your experience of reading her books. At the end of the day she never1.75/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wrote a particularly deep or interwoven web of lore, and trying to make sense of the world of HP was always a mistake. Her adding 1.75/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Extra nuggets along the way is not breaking something perfectly crafted and poised. Everything is canon, not everything is true. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People are idiots, more news at twelve.

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 7

Meh. I love the books, don't give two shits about the author.

5 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 0

Right, I still love the Harry Potter series itself, that's not changed because JK Rowling herself is a bigoted arsehole. Not that that's 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly new information what with her goblins that look straight out of Nazi propaganda or her portrayals of Asian women 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe there must be a separation between art and artist. I can appreciate a song, book, actor, etc and also thing it's creator is a cunt

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just like how you can hate an art piece, but like the artist as a person

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The books are wholesome and make me happy. I honestly don’t know what she’s said.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What did she say?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Her own personal opinions on gender based on her experiences, thats some people are saying is transphobic

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Lots of transphobic shit

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Fucking imgur, did not expect this comment to be the downvoted one.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm used to people defending her transphobia so I'm not surprised. She hates people like me and makes that very clear

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She mentioned that a full natural woman deserves to be called a woman instead of a "menstruating person", and then explained it

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This. I won't stop enjoying Orson Scott Card's books.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

What did card do/say? I’m personally looking forward to the final formic war book...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He thinks gays are bad m'kay

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I went looking for some decade old nostalgic music on YouTube and found out one band member had done some predatory stuff with young fans.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gotta separate the art from the artist, those songs are a part of me. Easier when there’s other band members that hold no blame.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A solo author is the only one responsible, but even then, consider they were a “different person” when they wrote vs who they are now.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like you're valid to stop championing works by ppl who hold beliefs you find repellant. You're also valid if you can still love a 1/

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 3

a story you loved before you knew; comfortable knowing your connection to the book is totally separate from your thoughts on the author 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Continuing anyway haha: some ppl opt for the former, others for the latter - it's a personal choice just based on how you feel I think

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yup. I can't read the books anymore knowing that she actively fights against my right to live, but still mess with the IP through /1

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

fanfic from time to time because it was a huge part of my childhood. It's very personal to have your rights attacked by someone /2

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I’ve never seen someone say she fights against the right of any group to exist, I’m sorry to ask, but what was actually said in this manner?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I didn’t realise she was active in her fight. What’s she doing?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What exactly did she say? I'm no fan of Potter or her so whatever is going on has passed me by

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She didn't go along with the sjw community and it really lit someone's tampon on fire. 'Biological sex is a thing'.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 14

Oh okay, thanks for risking the Downvotes and answering my question. All the best

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

In less inflammatory terms, she's a TERF, basically. She does things like unfollow other authors who are pro-trans, and such. It upsets (1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

a lot of people, especially those who found the HP books to be very inclusive in practice and due to their nature and community. (end

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

TERF? I don't think they weren't that inclusive at all. Cis white male protagonist and no LGBT characters clearly portrayed in the books.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It makes you wonder how popular HP would have been if this was known before the release of the first book

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She was pushing the old narrative that Transwomen are just 'men in dresses' and are rapists pretending to be women, then wrote the 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Villain of her latest book as being exactly that, while trying to frame the trans community and progress in trans rights as an attack on 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Women 3/3

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Not interested. It’ll just be a hp of every other open world fantasy games. No iteration. No new mechanics. Just an atm machine for them.

5 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 39

Depends on if Bethesda or EA has anything to do with it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bethesda, EA, Activision, Unisoft, Konami, Square Enix, Rockstar all micro transaction, mass lay off, sexual harassment scum

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Automated teller machine machine

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

says the the person who literally knows nothing about the game. thanks random stranger person, you've contributed a lot.

5 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 4

Exactly. I love when people get so against something when it's only been announced. You literally know nothing about it.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Thats what big budget game studios do now. Don't really need to know about it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yeah cyberpunk 2077 looks like a carbon copy of lord of the rings ps2. it's all big budget bro.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not what that means ya dingus

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is good enough 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

I honestly don't see an issue with that for HP fans. The only games for HP are the movie games & their Lego versions. Plus Quidditch.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quidditch was awesome, but none of them allowed for very much deviation. This gives people a chance to be a wizard. I'm hoping for HP skyrim

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly the AAA video game market doesn't care what fans want. All they care about is parting you from your cash.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How is that relevant? The game is being made. The fans will be happy when it's released. Sounds like, if it's popular, it's a big FU 2 them

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm always amused by the folks who say they are or aren't interested in a game months or years before they come out. I've been pleasantly1/2

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

and not so pleasantly surprised by games before. We'll see what it looks like on release. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

No man's sky? Anthem? Elder Scrolls online? Starwars battle front 2? Heed these lessons. The AAA games publishers is 99% scum

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

NMS wasn't a AAA, it was an indie game that got way amplified by Sony's marketing. Still published by Hello Games tho.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no man's sky is awesome now. battlefront 2 was awesome too. both updated like crazy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No man's sky took two years post launch to be worth owning and Battlefront 2 landed EA in court and banned in some countries... Just saying

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NMS was awesome at launch if you were totally out of the loop for the pre-release hype and post-launch backlash, as I was.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Assassin's Creed Odyssey? Resident evil 7? Doom Eternal? Alien: Isolation? There are plenty of franchises and developers who have turned1/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doom eternal is ID software Bethesda has very little say in the project. Should I bring up Aliens colonial marines?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Things around and created fantastic games after slipping up. There are even more that have never slipped at all. Half of Nintendo games 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While I definitely agree the game wont be worth playing I think its important to say new mechanics arent everything as long as the story 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

What story?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Sure, but to me most story driven games seem like the same thing reworked a bit. Soo many little and big details are the same/same style.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like you might want a show and not a game mate

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Look, we can either be strictly literal about our interpretation of the term "video games", or we can all agree that it actually means ->

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"digital interactive experiences", and as long as a game has player input, even just looking around, it's making use of the unique medium.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As good as this looks, I refuse to get it and support that astro terf bitch rowling. Unless the developers put in an option to make 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 23

The game probably costed a pretty penny to develop, and was well into development before Rowling’s tweets. By not supporting the game 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

2/2 are not supporting the dev team that have put hours upon hours into making it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

the player characters gay, lesbian, etc and trans as a fuck you to rowling. I don't even care if there's no romance options 2/3

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

so long as I can do that, make a gay trans wizard, that's all I care about. Fuck you astro terf rowling 3/3

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

It's set in the 1800s, so being gay and trans would probably have been a swift ticket to an early, uh, game over so to speak.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Not-so-fun-fact, the current average of a trans woman is in the mid-30s. So it's still, 200 years later, a swift ticket.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you log in after not playing for a while your character will be a different gender race and sexuality.

5 years ago | Likes 580 Dislikes 8

You either missed or ignored the actual point, and I can't quite tell which...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

JK personally goes in and reclassifies your character, permanently.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

"wtf, I selected gay female dwarf, but why does it say I have a foot fetish?"

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

JK - "HNNNG YEAH THAT'S THE STUFF UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNGGNGNGNGNGNGNG"

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Won't be trans though

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My patronus is trans

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless you buy non gender value pack

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well not gender, since JK Rowling is a terf

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 6

Don't worry, she'll rewrite the backstory to your character so they'll be born that gender, all female too.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that's that?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She thinks transmen are just scared women and transwomen are predators, supports anti-trans propaganda etc.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

trans exclusionary radical feminist, iirc.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Thx

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the names pretty self explanatory, though these days its more loosely applied to most anyone who voices strong transphobic sentiment

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

She spends a lot of time arguing against trans boogeymen who are pretending to be women to invite women-only spaces. This has been going...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

on for a while, but apparently her latest book that’s about a man who dresses in a burka to kill women. Could have come from a trump speech.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

*invade

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually, JK Rowling is quite against trans people

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

You also misused "Actually". It's used for facts

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That’s the joke

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Yes, it was. Which is why I commented here that JK Rowling wound not want you to change gender in the game

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Correct. Which is why the joke is funny

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm glad that we agree!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Money is the real gender.

5 years ago | Likes 796 Dislikes 7

I absolutely hate money. And those with lots of it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I identify as money

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I BURNED A WHOLE FUCKIN FOREST JUST TO REALISE MY DUMBASS KID IS A MONEY

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Oh i have three kids and no money. why can't i have no kids and three money?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I also bet she had little to nothing to do with this game

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

you never know. i mean look how much power she had in the movie casting etc.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That doesn't make cents.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She said nothing wrong, there are two genders thats it. If you feel like something else good for you, but that doesent change the facts

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 30

Gender is entirely a social construct

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Ok lets see if a vagina can penetrate my penis and plant a baby in me. You are worse than religious ppl ffs

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

That’s not gender dumbfuck

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That’s your physical sex. Which can be male, female or even both. Gender is not sex and you’re a fucking idiot

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Idk man, feels weird when you make your murderer of your novel apart of group you demonize in real life. Hints at more than a disagreement.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

In Harry Potter the main villain is a white heterosexual man. I guess she just hates everyone (sarcasm)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would hit differently if Voldemort was vegan and months be4 she introduced him, she went on a twitter tirade about the evils of veganism

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She wouldn’t be making a villain, she would be making a strawman to demonize the group. It would be more akin to preaching than storytelling

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Money is the only gender.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Can lack of money be a gender?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, but you can buy a gender. 1 dollar for men and 79 cents for woman.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What can get for 3.50? Also can I borrow 3.50?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There aren't only two binary genders, as gender is a social construct. There aren't only two sexes, either, as other combinations exist.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

Intersex people are still male or female and there is no such thing as a human hermaphrodite (i.e. has both)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Please tell me what I'm reading wrong, then, because true hermaphrodites are referenced in that link, and intersex is still not male/female.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Big yikes. More than 2 sexes? LOL

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

Here's a quick explainer from the Canadian government. Should clear things right up. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48642.html

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Which sex do you label someone born with some non-standard combination of male and female anatomy, then? I'm genuinely curious.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2020 11:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What other sexes are there?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Some people get extra sex chromosomes (I think) and have XXY or XYY. These scenarios are pretty rare though

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hermaphrodite is a well-known one. Here's a detailed list for more info: https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#XYY%20Males

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That is a disorder, hermaphrodite isnt a gender just like man or woman among humans

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

You are a moron. Man, woman or herma cuz something went wrong. Thats it no matter what your ideology is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

No you’re an idiot. Gender is not the same as a persons sex. It’s a social construct for identity. You have absolutely no understanding here

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know you ideology and what it says as i know what religious says about god. Both is your own fantasy and bullshit, dont try make it facts

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You just listed three sexes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, hermaphrodite if something goes wrong. Natural sexes is male or female in humans

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

well i agree with rowling, people who menstrate are in fact women.

5 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 68

Well I agree that myself that you're wrong and also a bithc

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

that's cuz you are in fact, a moron

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Nah, some of them are actually men :)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

So, people who don't menstruate aren't women?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

did i say? what part of my sentence did you get this nugget of information?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

That’s not scientifically factual. (Honestly I was surprised too. Genes are WAY more complicated then I thought) it’s pretty interesting.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

She made fun of an article title about menstruation because it didn't just say women. But trans women are women. Post menopause women etc

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Women who don't menstruate. It's nitpicking, incorrect, and would not have made sense for the article's subject.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If my grandmother had wheels, she would have been a bike

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2020 8:30 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

As many as you have brain cells.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

its a simple question, why can't you answer?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

Why does it matter how many there are? If you meet someone and they say "I use these pronouns" then use those pronouns. Easy peasy

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You do know that gender is about identity right and not body parts? A trans man who has not fully transitioned is still a man and if (1)

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

He menstruates, he's still a man. I get that you have your opinion, but that doesn't negate what trans people have to go through. (2)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

no its not, gender is about whether you're biologically male or female. end of.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Not really end of because biological sex isn't binary either, it's not just about XX and XY. Maybe you should do some research mate.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

show me some prove please, that there are more than 2 biological sex for humans.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Do your own fucking research if you care so much. But if you can't even be arsed to learn the difference between sex & gender I doubt u will

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I have to go to work, but if in the meantime you have forgotten how to use Google, I will compile a list of required reading for you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

genetic sex is xy, or xx but can also be yy or have a third which means there are 7 genetic combinations not 2. There you go.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or you could instead respect trans people and their identities. It's great because it doesn't even hurt you to be respectful

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 26

Or I can stand next to a real woman who is rightfully scared of the men in dresses threatening her with rape and murder.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 35

Would you mind explaining how protecting someone from assault prevents you from being generally respectful of a person's identity?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The dumbest thing about this shithead argument is a man that's unhinged enough to do that shit is going to break societal norms without 1/

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Having to pretend to be transgender.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

This is a harmful stereotype peddled mostly by Hollywood. Women have more to fear from men's rights activists with guns.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Holy shit. That is some real bigotry on display. Seriously, and with all due respect (which is none) Fuck You.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

Your feelings aren't facts. Just because you take offense to something doesn't mean an offense was made. If I took offense to your 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Comment does that mean you have committed an offense against me and now owe me an apology? Of course not. Just because I am offended 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Doesn't legitimize my belief an offense has occurred. If you don't wear a face mask outside 10 ft away from and I'm offended are you 3/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Again guilty of hate and disrespect? As a blanket statement, no you aren't. Have you actually read what she wrote or are you just being 4/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it wasn't a case of being respectful, she said something scientically factual, and because the lgbt community didnt like it, they trashed he

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 27

No she intentionally implied that trans men aren't men. That is transphobic and disrespectful

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 12

thats an opinion again, and i disgaree, i didn't think she intentionally wanted to be dissrepectful

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Is "men aren't trans men" misandrist?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, but it is an incorrect blanket statement about men. I'd be willing to bet most men aren't trans men, but some sure as hell are.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Her statements had nothing to do with science she flat out hates trans people. She blocked Stephen King for saying “trans women are women”.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 15

"women are trans women". Does that make sense?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

No, bc you're applying an attribute of a larger group to a smaller group within it. It's like if some1 said "irish people are white" so you

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thats your opinion, not based on fact. However, what she said is factually true.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 18

Biological women menstruate. Transgender women don't

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

No, it’s absolutely a fact that she does not respect trans people and does not think trans women are women. You’re defending a bigot.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

From what I've been reading, Rowling is not up to date with the latest science.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Well, that's 2 actual experts, I'll give you that. I found some rebuttals to their recent op-ed, but nothing yet from qualified sources.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

honestly, i don't care how people want to act, i'd only care that people who say scientically true statement aren't shot down. That's all

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

i wanted to impact from this discussion.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'd wait for more of a consensus among experts before concluding it scientific fact. Those two appear to be dissenters from the majority atm

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Please, please look into the body of work of the two authors in question. Neither actually studies topics relating to gender/sex.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

they're biologist, most rebuttal are from physocologist. My opinion, but gender is biology, and not a physchology subjet.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Interesting point. Even among scientists in the relevent field, it can be dangerous to step outside the specifics of your actual research.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there is a difference between biological sex and your perceived gender

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 10

Yep. Your point?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

So humans that menstruate, biologically female, can identify as the male gender. Hence, Rowling is misguided and so is the OP of this commen

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

can biological men menstrate?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 19

I’ve gotta do it just so you fix it moving forward: It’s spelled “menstruate”. There. I feel better.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

nope! but trans men sure can. stop being an asshole! ;>

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

show me the differecen biologically between a trans man and a women

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

I can't. That's the whole thing isn't it? Their body is one gender but their brain is another. It's called gender dysphoria. Try and keep up

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7