Yeah which one?

Dec 9, 2022 9:32 AM

PatThaiCM

Views

80910

Likes

1034

Dislikes

26

white_supremacy

poorwhitetrash

magats

politics

republicansareterriblepeople

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Like you could argue with a jan 6, q anon dimwit…..ok

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just tell them to look up dixicrats

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read the political party platforms prior to 1956, then compare to today. Interesting to read.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh the Klan votes democrat now?? These mother fuckers are so stupid.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The KKK was founded by 8 ex confederate army officers. Feel free to look that up.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'll never guess where all the racists went when the Democratic Party adopted the Civil Rights movement as part of their platform. Guess!

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The southern democrats left the democratic party after the civil rights movement. I WONDER WHERE THEY WENT.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

They know these talking points are ridiculous. They dont care about the truth. That's the real difference.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lets all pretend that little switch of the Dixiecrats to the Republican Party after the signing of the 1964 Voting Rights Act didn’t happen

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah they should try calling a Klansman a Democrat and see what happens.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My recent favorite is people saying the currently used to represent the Confederacy was actually the flag of the Army of Northern Virginia

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, remind me... who did they fight for again?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Social conservatives switched parties in the 60s

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The party switch is a myth!" Then why are nearly all of the "1960s political party switch" list Democrat-to-Republican?

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

the republicans literally invited the racists to join the party to oppose civil rights/desegregation in the 1960s. -

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

it was largely evangelical christian leaders that led the rapid shift in party demographics & is also to blame for the extremist GQP today.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Welcome to an argument I had with a coworker several times. Except he'd just say nothing changed and the KKK still supports dems

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

getting a lot of use out this these days

2 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Tell these people to read (ha ha ha) about the Dixiecrat Revolution, The Southern Strategy and The Lost Cause of the South

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah starting around 1950 and through 1980 most of the conservative democrats that wrote and supported Jim Crow laws became Republicans. 1/2

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For case and point please refer to Strom Thurmond. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not all MAGA's are racist but all racists are MAGA's.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All MAGA are racist, because they repeatedly endorse racists.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just another distraction tactic. using facts or logic will just waste your time. the appropriate response is “shut the fuck up”

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm begging every American to read up on The Southern Strategy.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

and the dixiecrats of 1948 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wish the Southern Strategy was spreading love for biscuits and gravy, but it's not, so we have General Sherman instead.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Biscuits and gravy are just about the only thing I will miss when I leave Alabama.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The wonderful thing is that you can make biscuits and gravy anywhere you are. The true meaning of freedom.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have lived in Alabama for nearly 40 years and the only way I know how to make B&G is to go to Waffle House.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good news is that it's super easy to make. Bad news is that you can make a ton. There is no plated portion size. You will eat it ALL.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Related: 'Political Ships of Theseus | The Party Switch' by Knowing Better: https://youtu.be/MwuFIJlY7fU

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I had an argument with a coworker who didn't know about the party switch, knowing the area he's from I'm not surprised it was left out

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Book rec.; To Make Men Free by Heather Cox Richardson. A history of the Republican Party.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They really, really hate it when you point out that white nationalists open supported Trump. "You're taking it out a context" "OK, explain."

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 126 Dislikes 2

I made this, but kept getting downvoted by well-meaning people who didn’t get the joke

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Also the party of Lincoln but they won't own up to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Awakes

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"A moment, gentlemen."

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

There you go with the purity tests. There is no true racist. Embrace the beautiful spectrum of bigotry.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

sorry, ive posted this before, but it bears repeating: BEHOLD! THE MASTER RACE:

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Given that Lincoln himself was racist and not particularly interested in ending slavery unless if it was politically expedient for him... ?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

?ending slavery was literally the worst thing he could have done politically?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, his writings were like "Do I want to end slavery? Only if I absolutely have to. And even then, I oppose sociopolitical equality."

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But he didn’t have to… he was forced to come to conscious moment as states were trying to force their will. He didn’t have to.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn’t the parties swap names at some point? So back then they were right wing but were just called Democrats. Complicated self own?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Not that they swapped names as much as the country changed around them. R's have been "the party of business" since before the Civil War,

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and their policies have shown that. Early on, they wanted a strong fed gov't to help businesses (national currency, tariffs, infrastructure,

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

etc.), then later they wanted to have less gov't to interfere with corporations. Early gov't expansion helped big businesses in the

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

northeast, but not the farmers that had moved west in the late 1800s. D's saw a huge, untapped voting bloc in the West, and started

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

promising fed aid to the poor farmers to get their votes. As far as the race issue goes, it's a combination of racism and greed. There's

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2022 5:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, no

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Nope. It's an actual talking point used by today's GQP, and this is an excellent retort. Every kkk member and neo nazi in the US today votes

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2022 5:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Would the official website of the Republican party of Texas meet your standards ?https://texasgop.org/the-democrats-have-always-been-the-par

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

@projectorgames citation for you.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Republican. They are very open about this.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No, this is a thing that MAGA people bring up constantly to try and say "nuh uh, you're the racists, you are".

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2022 5:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh man I'll get banned for posting Steven Crowder/Ben Shapiro links. Crowder's done that shit repeatedly. So has Carlson I believe.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

You live under a rock, we get it.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2022 5:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I gave you an answer.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Dec 10, 2022 5:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

BECAUSE IT"S SO FUCKING COMMON YOU PRACTICALLY HAVE TO BE AVOIDING IT ON PURPOSE.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I never understood the arguments of "this is what these people did 100 years ago, therefore they must be evil today". Political views change

2 years ago | Likes 340 Dislikes 2

Because the arguments are done in bad faith. They're just a ''gotcha'' to pander to their own base. They don't want actual discussion.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's on par with a worldwide conservative tenet: trying to justify your shitty actions by saying others did it too "everybody does it!",

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

here, they're just using the history of the two parties to justify their racism. classical.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A guy on here was using it as a way of saying "Dems are bad". I tried to explain the actual history and he just accused me of reframing /1

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it to attack the right. I told him it was right-wingers who had done it, and he refused to believe me. /2

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But you except conservatives to have intelligent points to make? To use logic? Reason? Actual reality? You silly goose.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Historical evidence that "the other side is bad" simply appeals to a emotion based thinking.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

100 years ago, I'd be a Republican, since they were the "left" back then.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Simple minds can't fathom that there was a shift in party ideals starting in the 1930's and ending in the 1970's.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People who make bullshit arguments like that have no consistent views about anything, and just say whatever they think will win the argument

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Was going to comment this. People need to stop acting like these are arguments in good faith.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And people in some areas not all, were just incredibly ignorant 100 years ago .

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If change was a concept they embraced, there would be no republican party. They are just cheering for their stupid team.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not a good faith argument, it's not intended to be understood.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The same people arguing that also argue that Nazis have been painted with an overly broad brush.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The justified application is when those people defend/deny what was done 100 years ago.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They think it’s a “gotcha!” Moment and that it absolves them of the suspicious “Maybe I *am* racist…” thought.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They do the same in reverse too. They call themselves the Party of Lincoln because they have to go back that far to be worth a damn.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet, if you tell them their ancestors were evil...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the fun part, the views didn't change, they all just switched parties and kept goin

2 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 2

They've also changed. Bernies tax proposals were drastically right of Nixon and he's too far left....

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For a while it was getting better, with 'all people are people' type amendments, then the party that had rejected racism decided racism was

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

electoral gold. (I use 'rejected racism' loosely)

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Because that happened in a Boomer and some GenX's life time they have problems accepting that change. That is the disconnect.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They really don't want to admit that everything after 1965 has been a racist back lash against civil rights.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a German, I HAVE to believe that

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I mean... I don't even doubt that the German people have changed since the 1930s. But if someone wants to support NSDAP, they're evil.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They haven't. Fascists slowly gaining power again, just with a student hat and more caution lol

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

what germany learned in ww2 was 1/3 of its people want to kill a 1/3 of its people and 1/3 is willing to sit and watch it happen. only fools

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

think they live a country without humans like that.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While racism may be on the rise, it is still a majority of Germans who are against it. Same in Sweden where I live.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0