45588 pts · August 21, 2020
The answer is both A or D hence both are 1 in 4 chance of picking. But that would make it 50% but no it would not because they are both different 25% options so you only have a 25% chance of picking a 25%. thus no matter what you still have a 75% chance of picking a different number other than 25% even if one of those is still 25% you still have a 75% chance of picking the other numbers. Therefor all choices are wrong and right.
You have found the lost O.J. Simpson tape!
Home insurance and let it burn before you move in. or not definitely not that would be bad I guess.
Look if you want it to be fair then that is fair. I do not hate the poor. I do not feel that we need to bail out people for choices they make like student loans. I do not think people should be given stuff long term. I also don think government should be involved with everything it is. If you want fair and equal there is only 1 way. But life is not fair some people have and some do not.
See there you go assuming again.
I never said I have it figured out just that you do not. As for you saying I do not understand tax brackets and college and society nor regulations, is a lie. You do not know what I know or what I do not know.
CEO pay compared to lowest person in the companies is fair? Why not make a pay scale for the whole country. Anything a company makes above that goes to the government. It takes away the need for people to advance and innovate. So force people to do what they do not want. That sounds like you are against the constitution, also sounds like a dictatorship. Forcing people to do things can never go wrong.
I never said anything against the constitution. Entitled and selfish because I feel everyone should contribute to make their life better not depend on others. Mass deaths and income disparity there is always going to be income disparity unless everyone is paid the exact same. There are lazy people and there are poor people some are the same some are not there are hard working poor people.
I have never said that others cant help if they want to help. I have stated that you are responsible for yourself and not to expect anyone to help you. You have stated you expect everyone to help the poor, and the lazy. You also say that if you work and get to where you are wealthy you are should not be able to do good in life. I bet you think everyone from top down should all be paid the exact same amount right. no rich no poor everyone the same.
Yes I do feel that you can get out of any situation you are in with the right work ethic. I feel that you should work for what you want and not rely on others to pay your way. also there should be better mental healthcare not free but better and more affordable. People should be responsible for themself. If someone feels like they are being keep down by the powers that be then do something for yourself. Do not expect others to bail you out.
https://europeansting.com/2023/06/23/does-universal-basic-income-work-these-countries-are-putting-it-to-the-test/
You saying it has yet to be implemented a then saying the same to me and trying to disprove my point is funny you cant disprove something that is not in existence or prove it either. I could be wrong and you could be wrong.
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/17048/government/universal-basic-income/
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career/universal-bas">e-ubi/">https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career/universal-basic-income-ubi/ https://www.procon.org/headlines/universal-basic-income-top-3-pros-and-cons/
Because UBI is universal, it would divert assistance from the most needy. Even under a leading proposal that leaves most of the safety net intact, a single parent with three children could lose up to $19,000 in annual benefits on net.
UBI would shrink the labor force. By definition, a smaller labor force would mean lower economic output and lower tax revenues to invest in the future.UBI is very expensive. A $12,000-per-year UBI would cost the government $2.4 trillion annually, or one-eighth of GDP. That’s nearly as large as the entire US safety net today.
If there is nowhere that it is being used how can you say that it would work. If UBI is implemented the money would come from other place like social security and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Along with other places. Unless you take more taxes from other places such as oil causing inflated oil prices. Wherever the money is taken from the price of that will go up more than is taken.
Where has it been implemented and worked? Yes the word choice is to try and make bad things seem good. Or good things to seem bad.
Universal means all. Therefor it would not be a UBI it would be a staggered basic income then.
You say they do not earn their money. They run the companies they make the decisions. should they pay better wages yes. should they not price gouge yes. should the working conditions be better yes. However if everyone hates the way the company is run then stop working go on strike do not buy from them. Yes it seems impossible might be. Now the car thing. Build a car if there are none to buy. If not the ceo has no workers to get to work, no workers no money.
If you buy lets say 2 cars and then your neighbor has no car then they want to take your car is that fair? You worked for the cars. They did not. Now lets say you buy 10 cars what is the difference? You earned the money to buy them it does not matter what you do with your money. If you have 2 cars and want to give one then that is fine. If you have 10 cars and want to drive past that is your choice also. So you think all get the UBI even the Super rich?
Who said unregulated there are other 3 letter agencies. So then the bottom 98% deserve to get a free ride? The needs of the many is to treat all the same. at 10% the more you make the more you would end up paying the less you make the less you pay simple math everyone pays, thus the needs of the many.
How is paying them more than most people make help anything. They need to be more regulations on them no stock trading at all for them or immediate family. Term limits and no special insurance, no pensions. It should be a service of want not a career.
Why should the 2% pay for the 98%. With a 10% tax on all we could do away with the IRS no need to investigate because it would go directly to the treasury.
Universal basic income makes it so people do not care to work. 400k where did you come up with that number? and 95 on over a million. So basically if you do good you get screwed, to redistribute what you have earned to everyone else. So then profit margins to cost regulations would make it even more difficult for small business. Oh we made 6% now we lost almost all our money guess we close down.
So all the people that did not go to college and got jobs they are uneducated? The ones that started small business? You say people are to poor to get a job then how do they get to college? Anyone can figure out how to get out of where they are in life if you want. If you have any kind of motivation.
IS your argument lets pay them a shitload and watch them do it anyway?
The argument is there needs to be change. They need term limits, and they need to be held responsible for the laws and polices that they make. They also need to see how that effects the people.
So because people choose to go to collage just like people choosing to buy a car or house or other things that loans are needed for. It is the responsibility of the people that did not choose that to pay for it? Drop the interest rate to 1 or 2% and its way easier to pay them back. Right now most people are being taxed 30 to 40% or more, and companies and "the rich" have ways out of paying. Whats your solution have "the rich" pay 90% of their Income so others pay 0%?
The answer is both A or D hence both are 1 in 4 chance of picking. But that would make it 50% but no it would not because they are both different 25% options so you only have a 25% chance of picking a 25%. thus no matter what you still have a 75% chance of picking a different number other than 25% even if one of those is still 25% you still have a 75% chance of picking the other numbers. Therefor all choices are wrong and right.
You have found the lost O.J. Simpson tape!
Home insurance and let it burn before you move in. or not definitely not that would be bad I guess.
Look if you want it to be fair then that is fair. I do not hate the poor. I do not feel that we need to bail out people for choices they make like student loans. I do not think people should be given stuff long term. I also don think government should be involved with everything it is. If you want fair and equal there is only 1 way. But life is not fair some people have and some do not.
See there you go assuming again.
I never said I have it figured out just that you do not. As for you saying I do not understand tax brackets and college and society nor regulations, is a lie. You do not know what I know or what I do not know.
CEO pay compared to lowest person in the companies is fair? Why not make a pay scale for the whole country. Anything a company makes above that goes to the government. It takes away the need for people to advance and innovate. So force people to do what they do not want. That sounds like you are against the constitution, also sounds like a dictatorship. Forcing people to do things can never go wrong.
I never said anything against the constitution. Entitled and selfish because I feel everyone should contribute to make their life better not depend on others. Mass deaths and income disparity there is always going to be income disparity unless everyone is paid the exact same. There are lazy people and there are poor people some are the same some are not there are hard working poor people.
I have never said that others cant help if they want to help. I have stated that you are responsible for yourself and not to expect anyone to help you. You have stated you expect everyone to help the poor, and the lazy. You also say that if you work and get to where you are wealthy you are should not be able to do good in life. I bet you think everyone from top down should all be paid the exact same amount right. no rich no poor everyone the same.
Yes I do feel that you can get out of any situation you are in with the right work ethic. I feel that you should work for what you want and not rely on others to pay your way. also there should be better mental healthcare not free but better and more affordable. People should be responsible for themself. If someone feels like they are being keep down by the powers that be then do something for yourself. Do not expect others to bail you out.
https://europeansting.com/2023/06/23/does-universal-basic-income-work-these-countries-are-putting-it-to-the-test/
You saying it has yet to be implemented a then saying the same to me and trying to disprove my point is funny you cant disprove something that is not in existence or prove it either. I could be wrong and you could be wrong.
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/17048/government/universal-basic-income/
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career/universal-bas">e-ubi/">https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career/universal-basic-income-ubi/ https://www.procon.org/headlines/universal-basic-income-top-3-pros-and-cons/
Because UBI is universal, it would divert assistance from the most needy. Even under a leading proposal that leaves most of the safety net intact, a single parent with three children could lose up to $19,000 in annual benefits on net.
UBI would shrink the labor force. By definition, a smaller labor force would mean lower economic output and lower tax revenues to invest in the future.UBI is very expensive. A $12,000-per-year UBI would cost the government $2.4 trillion annually, or one-eighth of GDP. That’s nearly as large as the entire US safety net today.
If there is nowhere that it is being used how can you say that it would work. If UBI is implemented the money would come from other place like social security and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Along with other places. Unless you take more taxes from other places such as oil causing inflated oil prices. Wherever the money is taken from the price of that will go up more than is taken.
Where has it been implemented and worked? Yes the word choice is to try and make bad things seem good. Or good things to seem bad.
Universal means all. Therefor it would not be a UBI it would be a staggered basic income then.
You say they do not earn their money. They run the companies they make the decisions. should they pay better wages yes. should they not price gouge yes. should the working conditions be better yes. However if everyone hates the way the company is run then stop working go on strike do not buy from them. Yes it seems impossible might be. Now the car thing. Build a car if there are none to buy. If not the ceo has no workers to get to work, no workers no money.
If you buy lets say 2 cars and then your neighbor has no car then they want to take your car is that fair? You worked for the cars. They did not. Now lets say you buy 10 cars what is the difference? You earned the money to buy them it does not matter what you do with your money. If you have 2 cars and want to give one then that is fine. If you have 10 cars and want to drive past that is your choice also. So you think all get the UBI even the Super rich?
Who said unregulated there are other 3 letter agencies. So then the bottom 98% deserve to get a free ride? The needs of the many is to treat all the same. at 10% the more you make the more you would end up paying the less you make the less you pay simple math everyone pays, thus the needs of the many.
How is paying them more than most people make help anything. They need to be more regulations on them no stock trading at all for them or immediate family. Term limits and no special insurance, no pensions. It should be a service of want not a career.
Why should the 2% pay for the 98%. With a 10% tax on all we could do away with the IRS no need to investigate because it would go directly to the treasury.
Universal basic income makes it so people do not care to work. 400k where did you come up with that number? and 95 on over a million. So basically if you do good you get screwed, to redistribute what you have earned to everyone else. So then profit margins to cost regulations would make it even more difficult for small business. Oh we made 6% now we lost almost all our money guess we close down.
So all the people that did not go to college and got jobs they are uneducated? The ones that started small business? You say people are to poor to get a job then how do they get to college? Anyone can figure out how to get out of where they are in life if you want. If you have any kind of motivation.
IS your argument lets pay them a shitload and watch them do it anyway?
The argument is there needs to be change. They need term limits, and they need to be held responsible for the laws and polices that they make. They also need to see how that effects the people.
So because people choose to go to collage just like people choosing to buy a car or house or other things that loans are needed for. It is the responsibility of the people that did not choose that to pay for it? Drop the interest rate to 1 or 2% and its way easier to pay them back. Right now most people are being taxed 30 to 40% or more, and companies and "the rich" have ways out of paying. Whats your solution have "the rich" pay 90% of their Income so others pay 0%?